Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/London Paddington station/1
London Paddington station edit
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted per layout and verifiability concerns Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:14, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
I don't think the article meets the GA criteria, especially about references. Look at the history section, it doesn't have much references (the first few paragraphs). "Flows on long-distance high-speed trains to or from Paddington" and "Suburban flows to or from Paddington" tables don't have any ref as well. "Paddington is an alternative London terminal for Chiltern Railways' service to Birmingham, used when London Marylebone is inaccessible for engineering or other reasons, and for one daily service (departs 11:36), towards West Ruislip, calling at South Ruislip." This statement does not have a ref. "Paddington station in fiction" - this section has a few statements not referenced.
Also, the article has too many images with images on both sides and also in the Gallery section. Some images also don't have suitable captions. Then, the LU infobox has too many key dates. The article also has no notes (not sure about this but usually GAs have it).
That's all I have to say. Hope to see some votes soon. ;) Vincent60030 (talk) 21:25, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delist The article falls quite short of the 2c no original research requirement. I found several other unreferenced statements throughout the article, including large parts of the London underground section. The image and table formatting is also a mess as the nom has pointed out. Winner 42 Talk to me! 01:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)