Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Disco 2000/1

Disco 2000 edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted.--Retrohead (talk) 14:03, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requiring demotion because the prose is bellow GA standards, the formatting is not properly done, and the article was left with no attention since its promotion in 2008.--Retrohead (talk) 23:04, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. Could you expand on what is wrong with the prose? How does a lack of attention since 2008 affect the quality of the article given that nothing relevant to the topic has happened since then? --kingboyk (talk) 12:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]