Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Curtis (50 Cent album)/1

Curtis (50 Cent album) edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Delisted. The author has been inactive since 2009, and the related WikiProject hasn't shown interest in dealing with the issues.Retrohead (talk) 16:00, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article fails the third criteria; it's not well researched.

  • The lead doesn't summarizes the entire article and fails a few criteria per WP:LEAD
  • The background and recording sections are poorly researched giving the publicity of the artist. I mean, even somebody who doesn't listen rap music has heard of 50 Cent.
  • Not all songs are covered in the "Music & lyrics" section. Again, this album received significant media exposure and information about all tracks can be easily found.
  • The "Commercial performance" has one missing citation. Furthermore, it reads tiring with the sales listed week-by-week.
  • Only the critical reception fullfils the criteria and is well referenced. It is perhaps the strongest section in the article.
I'll inform the related Wiki-projects about this nomination.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 22:08, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]