Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/1939 California tropical storm/1

1939 California tropical storm edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Closed Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 02:55, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the article is possibly slightly below the level of a good article. While it does address the main points of the cyclone in a concise way, I don't believe there are really enough images or explanations of terms to justify a good article rating. Also, the "Impact" section doesn't seem to be organized well enough to merit this status. Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 04:28, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article has problems in the sense that I don't think it's detailed enough but what you have described isn't exactly one of them. There aren't going to be many images for a storm that happened 80 years ago. And can you be more specific on "explanations of terms". If anything, jargon is more explained here than in most hurricane GA articles. The order of presentation in the impact is not how I'd do it if I was writing the article but regardless that's an easy fix. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 05:39, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose and close No clear issues and images are optional, according to WP:GACR. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 18:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose + Close The only thing I can see is the prose needs a tad bit of improvement. With the image thing, you simply need to look at the time period. There were minimal images at that time and most of them have likely been lost. As for the explanation of terms, I have no idea what you are talking about. This article isn't overly technical in its explanation of the system. Figfires^{Send me a message!} 00:41, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yellow Evan, Nova Crystallis, and Figfires: Thank you for your feedback. Does anybody know how to close the discussion? Also, thanks for educating me about good article reassessment. Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 02:50, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hdjensofjfnen: Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment has instructions on closing it. Figfires^{Send me a message!} 02:53, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Figfires: Thanks. Closed successfully. Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 03:04, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]