Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Group 4 elements/archive1

5 articles

Contributor(s): Stone, Mav, me, Cryptic C62, WP Elements

Not enough chemistry topics! --Nergaal (talk) 09:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support I agree! Covers everything. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing work! — Novice7 (talk) 14:13, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, with an asterisk. The section on Unpentquadium is unsourced in the main article. I'd be all the happier if you could get that sourced. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:59, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed. That is a better catch than you might have guessed (since although the statement was based on common inorganic chemistry, actual theoretical research predicts something else). Nergaal (talk) 02:11, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This, along with my last edit to the main article page, makes this topic flawless. I have no opposition to the nomination. FRE YWA 13:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support igordebraga ≠ 20:30, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support - amazing! -- EA Swyer ^Talk _{Contributions} 14:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, BTW Hafnium has some deadlinks. See book report for details. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 07:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Closed with consensus to promote. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:50, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]