Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Philosophy of science

Portal:Philosophy of science edit

This portal appears to meet all featured portal criteria. It was the subject of a portal improvement collaboration; and all recommendations noted at Portal talk:Philosophy of science/to do have been addressed. Rfrisbie^talk 01:59, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support, looks good. Kirill Lokshin 02:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, good job. --Gphoto^talk 03:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Once again, great job with the portal. =) Nishkid 64 20:54, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Great job! sign here — s d 3 1 4 1 5 13:54, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support: seems to at least meet all the criteria. Badbilltucker 21:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support but I think it would be better, if the portal has an anniversary section as well because it is about the philosophy of science. Having inventions related to science, birth/death of the great scientists on a particular day could make portal more attractive. Shyam ^(T/C) 12:34, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you point to some examples on featured portals so I can see how that could be implemented to featured quality? Rfrisbie^talk 14:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Okay, I try to put all the featured portals having selected anniversaries section. They are: Literature, Germany, Tropical cyclones, Biography, Scouting, Aviation, Trains, Military of the United States and War. They might be useful. The main page also has selected anniversaries section for example. Shyam ^(T/C) 18:41, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Thanks, I'll see what I can get started. Rfrisbie^talk 19:00, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      - The more I think about it, this recommendation is more appropriate for Portal:History of science for two reasons. First, we're talking about a "history" section. Second, it wouldn't be restricted to "philosophy" items at the other portal. Out of the three high-level science portals – Science, Philosophy, and History – "History" seems to be the logical and sufficient choice. Rfrisbie^talk 20:15, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        Yes, I do agree with you. The Anniversary section should go to History of science. So there is no objection to promote the portal. Shyam ^(T/C) 03:53, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        Thanks, maybe we can get that added over there, "real soon now." :-) Rfrisbie^talk 04:25, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]