Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Uranium reduction at Ames during the Manhattan Project

Uranium reduction at Ames during the Manhattan Project edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2011 at 22:14:05 (UTC)

Uranium refining at Ames during the Manhattan Project

A "bomb" (pressure vessel) containing uranium halide and sacrificial metal, probably magnesium, being lowered into a furnace
After the reaction, remnant slag coats the interior of a bomb.
A uranium metal "biscuit" from the reduction reaction

Reason

Encyclopedic value: critical chemical engineering advance for the first atom bomb, process still used today for uranium refining.
Composition: left-right process flow and use of pictures vice words to communicate to non-chemists.
Outreach: Director, Public Affairs, Ames donated larger images and clarified copyright

Articles in which this image appears: Manhattan Project, Ames process

FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/World War II (could also be material science or engineering)

Creator: unknown government photographer, TCO (upload and layout)

Support as nominator --TCO (reviews needed) 22:14, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Great work on getting hold of bigger copies. However, we aren't in the habit of promoting .tif files- we'd need to see them converted to jpg. J Milburn (talk) 00:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Files converted. Also some improvement of rotation and crop done on the images. (Since no one had voted, just changed the original.)TCO (reviews needed) 03:49, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS note: Pursuant to VRTS ticket # 2011070810013625 the three images are confirmed as public domain. — Cirt (talk) 02:11, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. JJ Harrison (talk) 08:10, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Good stuff. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 08:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. J Milburn (talk) 11:31, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Fascinating images.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:14, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, uber-vet. I feel that the caption for the first image needs a little skinnying somehow.TCO (reviews needed) 23:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Nice, ~~I suppose there are no colour ones?~~, 1945 b/w then. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 18:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Ticks all the boxes, nice to have a sequence of images, solid ev. What's the plan for this as a FP, each image separately or combined as one file? Fallschirmjäger ✉ 21:20, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's the assembly. I don't think they are as compelling as individual shots. To me, its the implicit process flow diagram, where you can really see. them. make. uranium!

They'll be promoted as a set. They'll all go in the gallery, but only one of them will hit the main page. J Milburn (talk) 21:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's a great idea, 'preciate! Would be curious which of the three you would choose?

P.s. I thought about doing some table or collage or even having block arrow and plus sign, but the default gallery (which I usually hate) works pretty decent here. Am re-using same layout method in the "Occurence" section of Fluorine". TCO (reviews needed) 00:41, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

support very interesting images--Thecheesefiles (talk) 08:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Ames Process pressure vessel lower.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 22:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC) Promoted File:Ames Process pressure vessel remnant slag after reaction.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 22:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC) Promoted File:Ames Process uranium biscuit.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 22:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As a set. Makeemlighter (talk) 22:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]