Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Tutufa bufo shell

Tutufa bufo edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2011 at 09:19:25 (UTC)

 
Original - Tutufa bufo shell
Reason
Featured on Commons, high quality, good EV, used in other national Wiki.
Articles in which this image appears
Tutufa bufo, Tutufa
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Others
Creator
George Chernilevsky
  • Support as nominator --George Chernilevsky talk 09:19, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. High quality, encyclopedic. NauticaShades 17:19, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'd add that I think the lighting issues are minimal here, and don't overly detract from the EV. NauticaShades 11:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Size reference, or scale, or description of the size on the image page would be helpful. Spikebrennan (talk) 20:33, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose uneven lighting in comparison of both samples. Jó Kritika (talk) 01:56, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose A bit hasty with the photoshopping? The lefthand shell is horrifically cut out. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 21:02, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The lighting leaves quite a bit to be desired. JJ Harrison (talk) 06:47, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy close??? Aaadddaaammm (talk) 21:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Speedy closes cause too much controversy. They only happen when the uploader requests a withdrawal. J Milburn (talk) 02:28, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Also, you should only invoke speedy close if there is absolutely no question that everyone is going to oppose. However, Nautica above clearly supports it; so speedy close is especially inapposite. Purpy Pupple (talk) 02:32, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, i agree with speedy close and withdraw this nomination. Thanks to all for review --George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 20:25, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]