Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Naturist

Naturist edit

Original - Nude woman tanning herself at a Formentera beach front.

Reason: Naturism or Nudism is a lifestyle in harmony with nature, expressed through social nudity, and characterised by self-respect of people with different opinions and of the environment. It can also be called a cultural and political movement practising, advocating and defending social nudity in private and public spaces. This image is showing a naturist, showing naturism and non-sexual nudity.
Articles this image appears in: Nudity
Creator: Flickr

Support as nominator Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 07:16, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Horizon tilted, not very appealing pose, looking straight into armpit... A good nude shot needs some pizzazz. (BTW, Flickr is not "creator" so please refrain from using that.) --Janke | Talk 08:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is naturism. Pizzazz is not applicable in naturism. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 09:19, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But it is applicable to FPC! ;-) --Janke | Talk 10:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. It is not applicable to FPC. You are mixing naturism with nudity. Naturism is a form of nudity, but it is non-sexual nudity. Naturism is opposed to clothing, and tells that not wearing clothes is natural. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 10:29, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me clarify: I was not talking about "nudity vs. naturism". To get a support vote from me, any image needs some "wow" i.e. pizzazz - regardless of subject. That "wow" can be either visual, or encyclopedic. This image has neither. --Janke | Talk 11:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Blurry at full resolution, unappealing composition. -- Grandpafootsoldier (talk) 10:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Placing in hide box, see Wikipedia_talk:Featured_picture_candidates#Nude_images :D\=< (talk) 09:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Janke. If he finds a wow, the pic gets a support vote from me as well. Dengero (talk) 10:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. Juliancolton (Talk) 19:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Janke. Cacophony (talk) 05:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Close no chance of promotion. Muhammad(talk) 06:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Close per above. Dengero (talk) 22:38, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]