Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Pink discography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by The Rambling Man [1].
Pink discography edit
Pink discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/Pink discography/archive1
- Featured list candidates/Pink discography/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: WikiProject Discographies
I am nominating this for featured list removal because the article no longer meets the requirements for WP:FLC as it did three years ago. The article cites forums such as this which breach reliability policies, and the references are a complete mess—some of which are missing publishers, while others are completely bare URLs. The tables include certifications from countries that are not part of the table, such as "ITA: Platinum". The lead fails to take into account her most recent album, and various other notable singles that charted highly. Till 15:59, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. This list is not well written, does not follow the proper discography format, contains a large amount of unsourced content, and yes, the sources are awful. Zac 21:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per nom and the actual state of sources. — ΛΧΣ21™ 21:36, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. Article is a mess now. Bruce Campbell (talk) 20:41, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist I have been meaning to raise the FLRC for sometime, but thanks Till for doing this. The article is atrocious. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:53, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per above. TBrandley 15:42, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.