Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Chris Brown discography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by PresN 03:30, 5 July 2015 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Chris Brown discography edit
Chris Brown discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/Chris Brown discography/archive1
- Featured list candidates/Chris Brown discography/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Candyo32, the initial nominator for the pages promotion in 2010
I am nominating this article on the basis of it's lack of citation in certain areas.
More specifically:
- The overly-long lead does not feature one single reference to back up its content.
- The entire Mixtapes section is unsourced.
- Three Promotional singles have no references to prove they are promotional singles, as opposed to Other charted songs.
- Several (25 to be exact) Guest appearances are unsourced.
- In several instances throughout the article, in the US charting column, charting placements exceed the number 100, without extra reference, while the main reference for the column does not support these placements of 100+, as any US placing between 101-125 charts on the Bubbling Under Hot 100 Singles, not the Billboard Hot 100, and required independent reference.
- Untidy referencing throughout the article, a specific example being the UK charting references in Other charted songs.
- 31 references are dead links.
I definitely think this article has declined in quality since it's promotion five years ago, it certainly wouldn't pass if re-assesed today. Azealia911 talk 23:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nominator; no progress made in the more than two weeks since this list was nominated for removal. Seattle (talk) 18:34, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE: It's now been a month since the removal request was opened and no progress has been made to the page. Azealia911 talk 09:21, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Unfortunately, no progress in last month since nom. Issues remain of overlong unreferenced lead. Unreferenced content within the article, multitude of dead links, overall not close to current FL standards. Cowlibob (talk) 21:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A month in, no progress has been made; as such, closing as Delist. --PresN 03:29, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.