Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/The Pretty Reckless discography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Hahc21 03:45, 9 March 2014 [1].
The Pretty Reckless discography edit
The Pretty Reckless discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel that after doing some hard work on it, this list finally meets the criteria. I have nominated (and successfully promoted) other discographies before so I'm aware of the criteria and the way a featured list should be. It is all organized, everything is well sourced and the references are properly formatted. Let me know if there is anything wrong that needs to be changed so I can resolve it. Thank you in advance. Decodet (talk) 23:34, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Prism
+ The lead section is rather short. Isn't there any information you could gather to describe the process of being signed to Interscope, or who discovered them? It would add a lot to the page. Try searching on Google Books for the band, if you're lucky, you may find some noteworthy Billboard magazines. Also, why were they dropped from Interscope?
- I've added some information. Thanks for the tip! About being dropped from Insterscope, we don't have any clue. Probably poor sales, but it's not covered by any reliable source. decodet. (talk) 03:03, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
+ I'd recommend you to add the parameters '|people=(add director)' and '|format=Music video' to the references that link to a video page (music videos section).
+ FN9 has website Lescharts italicized.
+ If US Alternative is shortened to US Alt. (with the dot) why is there not a dot on US Main(stream)? If you know what I mean.~
+ I reccomend you to change FN14 to Peak positions for singles as main artists and then the cite web template.
+ FN15 should have title changed to The Pretty Reckless — Kill Me - Single.
+ "Heaven Knows" needs reference to prove it's a single.
- There was no source because it has charted. But I've added a reference anyways! decodet. (talk) 03:03, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
+ On the extended plays section, "List of albums, with selected chart positions and certifications" should have albums changed to extended plays.
+ Lead needs references for singles (on the last paragraph).
+ In the Going to Hell part of the wikitable (Albums section), Release should be changed to Released. (typo)
- It is not a typo, actually. I put "Release" instead of "Released" because, well, the album has not been released yet. So putting "released" would be incorrect. March, 2014 is a future date as of now. Therefore, I choose to change it to "Release". ~~
+ FN11 has AllMusic italicized.
+ FN12 and 13 should not have Billboard and respective publisher wikilinked.
+ FN19 has VEVO italicized.
For now, I oppose this nomination, but I will support it as soon as you fix the issues I pointed out. :) prism △ 20:19, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your comment! I've worked on the issues you've pointed out. Do I have your support now? decodet. (talk) 03:03, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: (having stumbled here from my FLC discussion page). Succinct and well sourced. Nicely done, — Cirt (talk) 01:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support
- "Interscope Records signed the band for a record deal." is iffy. How about 'Interscope Records signed a record deal with the band.'?
- Music videos table could be made to be sortable.
Other than those two points, and I few minor tweaks I made, I see nothing wrong with this article, so I am happy to support. Adabow (talk) 09:52, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.