Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Mexican National Women's Championship/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 18 August 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Mexican National Women's Championship edit

Featured list candidates/Mexican National Women's Championship/archive1

Nominator(s): MPJ-US 23:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This list is the second to last list needed to create a Feature Topic on current CMLL Championships (the last one has not yet been created) and it follows the formats and standards of the twelve other Featured Lists I have gotten promoted over the years, and as always this list has benefitted from input received during previous FLC nominations and thus to me represents the qualities needed in a Featured List. I welcome all feedback and will be happy to take all constructive suggestions on. Thanks in advance for anyone's input. MPJ-US 23:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support from the POV of a wrestling editor: based on my review below, all concerns were addressed. starship.paint ~ KO 13:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MPJ-DK: Here are my comments: starship.paint ~ KO 06:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

... created and sanctioned by the Comisión de Box y Lucha Libre Mexico D.F. - needs a source.

Fixed

In the table, when you state live event, can you also state the promotion holding it? Because you said AAA and CMLL used the title but I don't know when they did.

I will go over the sources and clarify the time line
I have indicated which shows were specifically CMLL and AAA to clarify the timeframe a little better.

Please explain what is the point of the 1, 2 and the A, B, C in the table. Why not 1, 2, 3, 4, 5?

I see how that may look odd, so here goes. I have source confirmation on who the first and second champions were. Champions listed as A, B, C etc. have been sourced as ho!ding the title at a certain time but no confirmation on what number they are. There could have been 5 champs between 2 and "A", or none but records don't confirm that. It would be Original Research to list Rose Williams as " 3" and so on. The lineage is unclear so I tried to not make the list misleading. MPJ -US 11:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MPJ-DK: Ohh okay. I get it now! This explanation needs to be in the table Key. Could you leave a note there? Also, instead of A, B, C, D, E, F, G, I would suggest A1, B1, B2, C1, C2, C3, D1. starship

I have changed it to your suggestion, grouping them where the order of reigns is known.

.paint ~ KO 12:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Starship.paint: thank you for your input,I will address the last comment after some research. MPJ-US 11:10, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Starship.paint: I believe I have addressed all concerns? MPJ-US 13:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MPJ-DK: good. I have made this edit as I believe it is a better explanation. Do you agree? starship.paint ~ KO 13:34, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me, I was struggling with the wording. Thank you @Starship.paint: MPJ-US 22:32, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, this nomination hasn't received enough comment after 2 months, and I'm going to have to remove it to keep the FLC queue moving. --Pres N 16:46, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.