Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of literary works published in Asia Raja/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 00:09, 26 January 2013 [1].

List of literary works published in Asia Raja edit

List of literary works published in Asia Raja (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s):  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:16, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I think it's a solid look at the literary works published in what was, for a time at least, the dominant newspaper in what is now Indonesia. This is a little more in line with my major, but different than my previous nominations. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:16, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 09:36, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comments another nice niche piece, I so much love getting this sort of thing through from time to time!
  • I'm a complete novice in the subject and the context, but is it fair to suggest that " Japanese overlords" is somewhat more evocative than necessary? Happy to be shown wrong here by the way.
  • Kinda stuck on the terminology here. I can't think of another term that evokes "military occupiers of a country or state who do not colonise said country or state; usually use force against the indigenous peoples." — Crisco 1492 (talk) 18:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Keimin Bunka Sidosho" I guess you should clarify this is Indonesian?
  • "The single most-published writer in Asia Raja was Rosihan Anwar" perhaps note that he was a native?
  • Can't think of a way of doing it gracefully. "a native and recent high school graduate"? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 18:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "the tables are arranged alphabetically by title" add "initially" here.
  • No need for the Note column to be sortable.
  • Not one single one of these literary works is notable enough to sustain its own article. Fewer than half of the authors have links or articles. I'm sorry to ask, but is there a justification to collate together a group of non-notable literary works in this way?
  • Close to half, perhaps. Those I've linked are pretty much 100% certain to have enough references available to support an article. As for justification, the list is too long for the parent article to hold it (and thus passes 3b). I don't think we have anything of the exact same scope yet, but there are comparable articles: the songs in List of songs in Guitar Hero II and the like do not derive notability from their inclusion in the game (and outside a certain fan base this kind of cataloguing may be of very little interest); List of Claymore chapters and similar manga lists do not have a single blue-linked entry. Numerous lists have fewer than half blue-linked titles, including such recent promotions as Maya Angelou bibliography. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 18:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would make column widths the same for each column from section to section.
  • Coding is for the same width, don't know why/if it's showing up different sizes for you. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 18:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 17:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for the comments. Glad you like getting a "niche pieces" every once in a while. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 18:11, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - I quite liked this list, and didn't see anything wrong with it. I too like seeing lists that aren't discographies or sports-related pop up. I'd prefer if "Unknown" authors didn't sort under "U", but I couldn't find a good way to do it. Thanks for archiving your online references! --PresN 19:20, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the support! Unknown authors could be supported using {{sort|.|Unknown}}, but then we'd lose the grey background. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:09, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. The sentence says, " Instead, writers hoping to be published had to focus on positive themes in an effort to instill positive traits in society; by the end of the occupation, this meant a nationalistic struggle.". However, Asia Raja was for Japanese propaganda. So, how can writers be forced to focus on something that by the end of occupation came on to mean nationalistic struggle? May be I am reading it wrongly.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:15, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • You're reading it correctly, and it's written correctly. You'd have to read the end of Japanese occupation of Indonesia to get a good understanding of that. By mid-1945 the Japanese leadership recognised that they would not win the war and would be forced to withdraw from Indonesia (among others). Rather than give the archipelago (and its resources) back to the Dutch, they supported Indonesian nationalism. This ensured that the Dutch would either lose their control over the resources there, or waste many resources fighting a war with the Indonesians. As such, Indonesian nationalism was still, at least partially, in the Japanese interest. Check out Proclamation of Indonesian Independence to see the Japanese role in that event; it sure wasn't insignificant. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Aha, now I understand. Thanks for the explanation. I was completely unaware of this. However, I—as an uninitiated reader—did think wrongly. So, don't you think a description (nationalistic struggle against Dutch) or, at least, appropriate wikilink, is needed?--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • Added a link, later I'll take a look at the books I have at home for sourcing a footnote — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        • Added a footnote. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:35, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
          • Undstood. I support this list to be a featured one. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:06, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Crisco always makes good lists. Regards. — ΛΧΣ21 19:46, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_literary_works_published_in_Asia_Raja/archive1&oldid=1079643427"