Comments from Vensatry
- Ref #1 is not working, check the URL
- Italicise "Wisden" in "Wisden Cricketers of the Year"
-
- "and was named as one of their Cricketers of the Year in 1983" who was named, Wisden? —Vensatry (Ping me) 11:29, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No need to re-iterate test in "His first Test five-wicket"
- Removed Test. Zia Khan 11:09, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- "He took 9 wickets for 41 in the match", something missing here
- "owing to his man-of-the-match performance the West Indies won the match by an innings and 156 runs", you mean to say that West Indies won the match because he was awarded the MoM; also too many "the" in the quotes sentence
- I mean WI won because of his man-of-the-match performance. Removed one "the". Zia Khan 11:09, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- You mean he was adjudged MoM before West Indies won the match? —Vensatry (Ping me) 11:29, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Where did I say this? Rephrased, anyway?
- "Marshall made his One Day International (ODI) debut during the England against at Headingley": grammar fail
-
-
- The penultimate sentence of the last para is too long.
- Shortened the statement. Zia Khan 11:09, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove the the that precedes West Indies, and Lost -> lost —Vensatry (Ping me) 11:29, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. BTW, have a look at The Rambling Man's comment here. Zia Khan 11:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- We'd normally use the depending upon the type of sentence. See this one for example. "a match the West Indies lost at the Melbourne Cricket Ground" sounds odd to me. —Vensatry (Ping me) 12:21, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Exactly, same here. Fixed, as you suggested! Zia Khan 13:59, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't think the category "One Day International cricket records" is relevant here since he has not taken fifers in ODIs.
—Vensatry (Ping me) 10:39, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the comments, appreciated! Zia Khan 14:01, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Further comments
- Date for the 19th entry and Econ. for the 11th entry are wrong.
- Entry #1 has only four batsmen listed and #7 has only six. Check the last two columns once again.
- In ref #10, author=agency?
—Vensatry (Ping me) 12:56, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|