Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of cast members of The Simpsons
List of cast members of The Simpsons edit
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 21 days, 4 support, 1 oppose. Promote. Scorpion0422 16:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Been working on this for a while, its complete with the specifications mentioned in the lead etc. Anyway, I'll try and adress any concerns that are raised. Gran2 17:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Why do some characters have references and others do not? IMDb is often not considered to be a reliable source. Is a "notable character" a character who makes more than one or two appearances? –thedemonhog talk • edits 03:24, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The characters without references are covered by the two book references cited at the bottom of the page. IMDb is excepted for filmography type uses, when you using it to say that someone has been in a certain thing. A notable character is a character that doesn't just have one line in one episode, or a character that has just appeared once or twice. Gran2 07:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure the massive table format for the main cast, which does not really enhance legibility (you see the actors' names far below the first character they voice) and causes issues on Firefox (large cell merges cause borders to go wonky), is necessary. Maybe something like this would be enough:
- Actor
- Character McCaracter
- John Doe
- Hank Foobar
Circeus (talk) 05:39, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well its was like that, but I thought it looked terrible, and that's why I changed it. And on my browser, it looks fine, otherwise I wouldn't have used this design. Gran2 08:33, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Just a few things I'm unsure about.
- Just pointing out that some of the character links are broken, eg. the Llewellyn Sinclair and Mrs. Sinclair link is broken as it points to a subheading of those characters' names on the List of one-time characters from The Simpsons page, however on that page it seems the subheadings have been modified to season numbers only.
- Also, with citing "various" as the characters voiced by an actor, I'm not exactly sure what the issue is with citing specific roles - Maurice LaMarche ("various") is credited with "several" roles, but Jon Lovitz is credited with six specific roles; how big is the difference?
- And did Christopher Collins only provide the voices of Mr. Burns and Moe in season one, as suggested in his notes? - if not, why not cited as specific characters in the appropriate column?
- That's about it. Otherwise, great list, meets all criteria. Oh, and I'd have to agree with Circeus on the above point - Firefox does screw up the borders in that huge table, the middle column divider is missing most of the way down - but I don't think that's likely to be fixed, or of highest priority. •97198 talk 11:02, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll fix up the other two things, but to explain the LaMarche point: There's a difference, all of LaMarche's parts have been a background character that often doesn't have a name and has had only a couple of lines, and so isn't really central to the episode's plot. Whereas all of Lovitz's characters have been. Gran2 11:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Well-sourced, nice organization. The only little thing I would change is to use {{reflist|2}} for the references section, to double it up. Cirt (talk) 07:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Support: Would it make sense to alphabetize the actor and character columns? -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 23:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the support. I put them in the order of importance laid out by the book sources. Gran2 23:04, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Sorry, but I just don't feel that a table is the best way to represent the data here. Heck, there are enough characters in most cases one could argue that the major cast should each have their own sections! THe section is also illustrated with a mix of people from it and otehr sections, which is confusing. Circeus (talk) 23:33, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well as I said, it was like that, but it looked terrible. Anyway, I take your concerns on board, but unless there is multiple opposition about the tables, I'm not going to change it. Gran2 23:39, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That's fine with me. I just felt very uncomfortable with not properly voicing my concerns. An alternate formatting might be the use of CSS columns (as are used for the reference sections) or the addition of a few extra bits of info to mitigate the list (as in List of North American birds). Circeus (talk) 00:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well as I said, it was like that, but it looked terrible. Anyway, I take your concerns on board, but unless there is multiple opposition about the tables, I'm not going to change it. Gran2 23:39, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]