Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Peter Dinklage/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 17 July 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Peter Dinklage edit

List of awards and nominations received by Peter Dinklage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): AffeL (talk) 13:44, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because it meet the criteria and Peter Dinklage is awesome... AffeL (talk) 13:44, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 15:02, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose quick runthrough....
  • Four paras in the lead, but easily condensed down to two. I would like to see more in there and fewer tiny paras. The lead also currently lacks decent coverage of all these awards/nominations.
Done - AffeL (talk) 09:30, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "who has received various awards and nominations, he has been nominated for " grammar.
Fixed - AffeL (talk) 08:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Film titles and television series titles should be in italics.
Done - AffeL (talk) 08:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Infobox shows 11 wins, not 9.
Fixed - AffeL (talk) 08:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • And 52 noms, not 48.
Fixed - AffeL (talk) 08:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • ", withdrawn, unmarried man, he also garnered " again, should be a new sentence.
Done - AffeL (talk) 08:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Dinklage has received two nomination." nominations.
Fixed - AffeL (talk) 08:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Twice.
Fixed - AffeL (talk) 08:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "received three nomination." ditto.
Done - AffeL (talk) 08:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 01:18, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: I believe I have fixed everything you wrote above. - AffeL (talk) 09:30, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Carbrera
  • Under "Monte-Carlo Television Festival", you mention "Dinklage has been awarded once from one nomination" yet the table claims he was only nominated. I'd change the statement because it may lead the reader into thinking that Dinklage actually won. Other than that, a very a good list indeed. Carbrera (talk) 05:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC).[reply]
@Carbrera: Thank you. I have now fixed that sentence. - AffeL (talk) 08:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Per the above resolved comments and my suggestion, I will now support this list. Thank you. Carbrera (talk) 22:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Resolved comments from Littlecarmen (talk) 18:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Littlecarmen
  • "1995 low-budget independent comedy-drama film Living in Oblivion" You can remove the "film". The "comedy-drama" makes it obvious to the reader that you're talking about a film.
Removed "film". - AffeL (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "He was nominated at the 10th Screen Actors Guild Awards for Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Leading Role for starring in the critically acclaimed comedy-drama The Station Agent (2003)" This is really long. You can just say that he was nominated for his performance in that film, you don't need to spell out the full title of the category (this goes for the rest of the lead as well). Maybe mention that he played the lead role.
I rephrased it. - AffeL (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"For starring in the critically acclaimed comedy-drama The Station Agent (2003), in which he played a quiet, withdrawn unmarried man. Dinklage received a nomination for the Screen Actors Guild Award for Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Leading Role and he also garnered a Best Ensemble nomination for the same role." This is still very long and there shouldn't be a period there.
I trimmed it. - AffeL (talk) 09:55, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Chicago Film Critics Association Awards for Most Promising Performer and Online Film Critics Society for Best Breakthrough Performance. He was also awarded the New York Film Critics Circle for Online Award for Breakthrough Performance." You need to rephrase these because they don't make a lot of sense right now.
I rephrased it. - AffeL (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"The role earned him nominations for the Chicago Film Critics Association Awards and Online Film Critics Society. He also won the New York Film Critics Circle for the film." He didn't receive nominations for a society or a circle. You need to rephrase this.
What do you mean?, Online Film Critics Society and New York Film Critics Circle are what these award shows are called. I added "award" at the end of both "society" and "circle", so that it's clear. - AffeL (talk) 09:55, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It still doesn't really make sense since there isn't just one Chicago Film Critics Association Award, Online Film Critics Society Award or Satellite Award. They're ceremonies that give out lots of different awards. Littlecarmen (talk) 18:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "He and the rest of the cast were nominated for Screen Actors Guild Awards for Outstanding Performance by an Ensemble in a Drama Series" Awards → Award
Done. - AffeL (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Then you need to add a "the" before the title of the award. Littlecarmen (talk) 03:55, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done. - AffeL (talk) 09:55, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Empire Awards and Golden Globe Awrads sections: "Dinklage has received one award from one nomination." You can remove the "from one nomination."
Done. - AffeL (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The Gold Derby Awards are awarded annually for the best of television and film." This should be reworded.
Done. - AffeL (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The Independent Spirit Awards are presented annually by Film Independent, to award best in the independent film community." You can remove the comma.
Done. - AffeL (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I also think you should reword "to award best in the independent film community." Littlecarmen (talk) 03:55, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done. - AffeL (talk) 09:55, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • IGN Awards and IGN People's Choice Awards sections: Worthy? I think you should rephrase this.
Done. - AffeL (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
recognise → recognize
Fixed. - AffeL (talk) 09:55, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • MTV Movie & TV Awards: The references don't need a break between them.
Fixed. - AffeL (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • New York Film Critics Circle: It would be interesting to know which achievements they honour instead of when the ceremony takes place. "Dinklage has won the award once." → "Dinklage has received one award" (to be consistent"
Done, added what they honor. - AffeL (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Online Film Critics Society: "Dinklage has been nominated once." → "Dinklage has received one nomination."
Done. - AffeL (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The Portal Awards are awarded annually to genre television and film every year." This is redundant.
Removed "every year". - AffeL (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The Primetime Emmy Award are presented" Award → Awards
Done. - AffeL (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The Television Critics Association Awards are awards" This is obvious.
Fixed. - AffeL (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "First awarded in 1995, the awards" Change "the awards" to "they". "Dinklage has been nominated eleven times." → "Dinklage has received eleven nominations."
Done. - AffeL (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • You need to add publishers to your sources and you only need to link magazines/websites etc. once. Littlecarmen (talk) 14:36, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Littlecarmen: All done, changed so that magazines/websites are only linked the very first time. - AffeL (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You haven't added publishers. For example, The New York Times is published by Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., Daily Express is published by Northern and Shell Media, etc. Littlecarmen (talk) 03:55, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Added publishers for those I could find. @Littlecarmen: How does it look now? - AffeL (talk) 09:55, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Every time I look at this list, I keep finding more and more issues. I just took a look and you didn't request a peer review before nominating this for featured list status. I think you really need to do that and perfect this list before you nominate it a second time. Littlecarmen (talk) 18:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What issues?.. and you don't have to to request a peer review before nomination something. Your "oppose" does not mean anything if you can't come up and present any real issues with this list. I have addressed all your comments btw, but it's clear that you are not willing to discuss for some reason. - AffeL (talk) 18:27, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You did address all of the comments I have posted so far but I kept finding more and more and concluded that you needed to work on this list more. It's not mandatory to have your article peer reviewed before nominating it but you do need to make sure it is up to FL standards and I think a peer review is a really good way to do that. Now if peer reviews really are defunct, that's a shame but I don't think the FL nomination process should be used as a substitute. Littlecarmen (talk) 04:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment does not hold any value if you can't come up with any issues with this list and a valid reason for the "oppose". You can't just say that their are problems with this list, but I won't tell you what. - AffeL (talk) 08:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's true. Un-actionable comments tend to be ignored by closing delegates. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:06, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@AffeL: Alright, your comment on my nomination may be the most childish thing I have seen during my time on Wikipedia. I'm just going to strike my comments here and remove this page from my watchlist. Good luck with your nomination. Littlecarmen (talk) 13:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man: What do you mean it's defunct? Littlecarmen (talk) 04:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Barely functioning... The Rambling Man (talk) 05:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Peter_Dinklage/archive1&oldid=1076194934"