Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by WandaVision/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of accolades received by WandaVision edit

Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by WandaVision/archive1

Nominator(s): -- ZooBlazer^talk 00:32, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WandaVision premiered on Disney+ with its first two episodes on January 15, 2021, making it the first television series created for the streaming platform by Marvel Studios after over a decade of focusing solely on films. The series went on to be nominated for 112 awards, winning 31 times.

I'm nominating this list on the behalf of @Favre1fan93, who is one of the main contributors, after he asked if I could do so. -- ZooBlazer^talk 00:32, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ZooBlazer: - it says at the top of the FLC page Nominators should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed. The first one you nominated (2012 NBA draft) does not yet have substantial support yet you have now nominated THREE more. I suggest you ask the co-ordinators to archive at least the two most recent...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh shoot, my bad. I'll work on getting it taken care of. -- ZooBlazer^talk 08:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. BTW I will try to review the 2012 NBA Draft one later to try and give it a bit of a kickstart...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude If you have time, would you want to review this article now? One of my articles was promoted to FL and another archived, so this list is eligible to be reviewed now. ZooBlazer 18:15, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MyCatIsAChonk

Nom issues aside, still happy to review. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 21:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I'm very impressed to have no concerns with this, this is a Chompy Ace-level list. Wonderful work, and on such an excellent show! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 21:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chompy Ace

Support: I have no concerns since this list is consistent with recent, modernized FLs, like List of accolades received by Avengers: Infinity War, List of accolades received by Skyfall, and List of accolades received by The Batman (film). Chompy Ace 19:31, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

EN-Jungwon

Add alt text to the images in the infobox.
List all the awards in the infobox in alphabetical order.
I noticed that the award column in the table is aligned in the center. I looked through some of the lists that Chompy Ace linked above and they don't seem to have the column centered so I suggest removing style="text-align:center;" from that column.
I counted 109 nominations and 28 wins in the table so fix that in the infobox.

That's all. -- EN-Jungwon 13:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@EN-Jungwon Everything has been addressed. ZooBlazer 17:55, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- EN-Jungwon 06:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source review – pass edit

Hiya, I'll try not to screw anything up here (version)

Formatting

Names of any award organisations should be unitalicised
Same for the International Press Academy
@Pamzeis As far as I can tell the only time either is italicized is in the ref template, which is automatic as far as I know. ZooBlazer
Yeah, that was what I was referring to. You can use the |publisher= or |agency= parameters to unitalicise them. Pamzeis (talk) 01:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done. ZooBlazer
fn 12: should bmi.com be Broadcast Music, Inc.? I'm not sure about this one
Done. ZooBlazer
fn 43 & 56: mark as |url-access=limited
Done. ZooBlazer

Verifiability

I think "Elizabeth Olsen and Kathryn Hahn received widespread acclaim from critics and audiences" in the Infobox needs sources per MOS:ACCLAIMED
The acclaim is in this case is just talking about the number of nominations received for their acting, which each nomination is cited. ZooBlazer
I ended up changing the wording after looking at other FL accolade articles. ZooBlazer
~~Hopefully will do Spotchecks soon; ping me if I don't do them by Tuesday, 'cuz that's mean I've forgotten~~
Spotchecks are clear. Pamzeis (talk) 01:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reliability

Is Goss.ie reliable?
Same for La Opinión; it seems to be a tabloid
~~Not sure if it's the best way to check, but the reliability plug-in doesn't mark either site as unreliable.~~ They've been replaced. ZooBlazer
I'm not sure ¡Hola! is reliable either, as it seems to be the Spanish version of Hello! (magazine), an unreliable source. Pamzeis (talk) 01:23, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It was tough, but I found a better source. Not a whole lot of places listing the 2021 winners of those awards. ZooBlazer

OK, I think that's a pass for the source review. Pamzeis (talk) 08:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Other comments by Pamzeis edit

"WandaVision is an American television miniseries created by Jac Schaeffer for the streaming service Disney+, based on Marvel Comics featuring the characters Wanda Maximoff / Scarlet Witch and Vision." — this sentence has a lotta information, which has the potential to be lost. Can it be split?
"and Evan Peters also starring." — a nitpick, but these could be interpreted as "also starring" credits, which are different from "starring" credits in television, I believe
"was nominated by critics for two Golden Globe Awards" (emphasis mine) — AFAIK, the Golden Globes are presented by the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, which are an organisation of photographers and journalists. Or am I missing something?
These three things have been addressed. Let me know if I need to do something further with any of them. ZooBlazer

Hope this helps :) Pamzeis (talk) 13:05, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think everything has been addressed. ZooBlazer 20:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pamzeis I've addressed the rest of the things you brought up. ZooBlazer 02:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"starring as well" reads a little oddly to me. I appreciate the comment above about the ambiguities of "also starring" but maybe say "and the cast also includes Debra Jo Rupp" etc?
Infobox photo caption is missing a full stop
That's it, I think :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@ChrisTheDude Thanks for the comments. Both things have been changed. ZooBlazer 13:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image review – Photo licensing for the images in the collage looks fine for both, and alt text is there, which is always nice. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:06, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.