Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Moonlight (2016 film)/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of accolades received by Moonlight (2016 film) edit

Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Moonlight (2016 film)/archive1

Nominator(s): Cowlibob (talk) 14:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moonlight is a 2016 American drama about a young African-American gay man struggling with his sexuality. It won numerous awards including the Academy Award for Best Picture. This list covers these, as always look forward to all the helpful and constructive comments on how to improve it. Cowlibob (talk) 14:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a long time since I reviewed any of your FLCs.
Comments from Skr15081997

Since Dede Gardner, Jeremy Kleiner, and Adele Romanski were recipients for the Academy Award for Best Picture, they might be added to the lede.
Something could be added to the publisher parameter in the OFCS citation.
I have gone through this film's awards page at IMDb and the following awards could be added to the list–2017 Gold Derby Awards, IndieWire Critics' Poll and Village Voice Film Poll.
All the recipients and nominees are sorted by their last name.

This one needed lots of work and you have tackled it brilliantly. Regards, --Skr15081997 (talk) 14:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Skr15081997: Thanks for the review. I have fixed most of these points. I don't think Gold Derby or Indiewire are notable awards so haven't included them as they don't have independent coverage apart from a simple listing of award wins. I'll nominate Gold Derby for AFD later. Cowlibob (talk) 11:43, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support My concerns have been resolved. Do bring Gold Derby and IndieWire awards to AfD. --Skr15081997 (talk) 11:51, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

" at over 600 theaters." more than.
" worldwide total of over $55 million at the box office" one of the two refs here (the-numbers.com?) says around $26m, not $55m. I'm not seeing $55m in the other ref either...
Are the notes referenced?

The Rambling Man (talk) 07:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Thanks for your comments. I've fixed the above. For the second, you've picked up a flaw with the Internet Archive Bot as sometimes mobile events like a box office of a film moves beyond the last archive as in this case so have updated to a more recent archive. Cowlibob (talk) 12:55, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Mymis

Comments by Mymis

From the first paragraph is not particularly clear who plays who; you only explain Naomie Harris and Mahershala Ali's roles.
Does the film only deals with the main guy's sexuality? I have seen it and it covers his life as a young person in general, it's more about his identity and life choices.
"first LGBT themed" -> a dash is needed I think?

Mymis (talk) 01:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mymis: Thanks for your comments. I have changed the lead and explained everyone's role in the film. I have added that it's also about Chiron's struggle with his identity as well. Added dash. Cowlibob (talk) 15:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good. The only thing I would change is, "The film was produced.." -> "Produced by.." and then merge the sentence with the subsequent one. Because you use same sentence structure for the whole paragraph. Mymis (talk) 23:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mymis: Good suggestion. Have made the amendment. Cowlibob (talk) 10:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have my support. Great job! Mymis (talk) 11:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice work on prose and organization.--Earthh (talk) 20:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question – Doesn't a see also section usually come before notes? Giants2008 (Talk) 21:08, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Giants2008: I think you're right. I have swapped them around. Cowlibob (talk) 10:27, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source review – All of the references appear to be reliable enough for FL standards and are well-formatted. The link-checker tool revealed no problems, and neither did spot-checks of references 20, 37, and 55. This source review is a pass, and I'll go ahead and promote the list now. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:19, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.