Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Prime Ministers of Vietnam/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by Giants2008 23:22, 2 November 2012 [1].

List of Prime Ministers of Vietnam edit

Featured list candidates/List of Prime Ministers of Vietnam/archive1

Nominator(s): --TIAYN (talk) 06:28, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnam... --TIAYN (talk) 06:28, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 09:18, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Done Don't overlink Vietnamese language in the lead.
Done I think it's legitimate to actually link Vietnam in the lead.
Done "The office has throughout its history " -> "Throughout its history, the office has..."*Done "Present" -> present.
Done "8th convocation" seems to have a space before it.
Done Don't understand why you have continually indenting bullet pointed See also links.
Done "that doesn't happen " avoid contractions.

The Rambling Man (talk) 07:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(I've removed the see also section, so what to do?) "(for a list of South Vietnamese prime ministers, see Leaders of South Vietnam)." that's what the See also section is for.
- Done Add a See also section. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:43, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done "there have been eight prime ministers of Vietnam,[5] but there has been 29" have... has.... consistency. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:41, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Arsenikk ^(talk) 17:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

;Comments from Arsenikk ^(talk)

(I can't seem to fix that) Is it possible to narrow the first two columns (no.) so they do not take up so much space.

Done I would suggest removing all the forced widths from the tables, that should resolve the issue. NapHit (talk) 19:04, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done No need to include links in the see also section included elsewhere in the article (that goes as far as I can see for the three last entries).
Done I do not understand how the information in the tables are referenced.

I've referenced them now, see the References section.. A list of general sources has been included in the article (both Vietnamese). --TIAYN (talk) 06:30, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done The second paragraph seems to be an overkill in establishing what the government official thinks about the position, which could be formulated a bit shorter. I would like to see a ref for the total numbers.
Done The lead is a bit short. Could for instance include information on how prime ministers are appointed/elected.
Done Odd space before 4th convocation.

Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back... I've been gone for a while, due to the fact that I'm working in the army, but I'm free this upcoming weekend, so I'll fixs all the outstanding issues with this list then, OK? --TIAYN (talk) 15:38, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently waiting for the reviewer to reply. --TIAYN (talk) 18:39, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have you contacted Arsenikk directly, via his talkpage or email? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:21, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting to support until TBrandley's issues have been addressed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 17:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Arsenikk ^(talk) 17:28, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from TBrandley (talk) 16:28, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

'Comments

Done Add alt text to all of the images, for the one in the template, perhaps you can edit the template itself, and add alt text to it, this is all per MOS:IMAGES and WP:ALT
Done After its first link and mention, "Vietnamese" should not be linked again, as per WP:OVERLINK. "known as Chairman of the Council of Ministers (Vietnamese ...) it should not be linked there, as its first link is above.
Done "The prime minister is also" remove also as it is redundant and not necessary
Done "has been responsible, at least de jure," huh? I don't get the second part.
"Done According to the website of the office of the Prime Minister, the modern office of the Prime Minister" wow, there is a lot of "of" in there, can that full sentence be copy-edited, and changed, mainly due to that?
Done "Officially there has only been 8 prime ministers" remove only as per WP:NPOV
Done As per MOS:HEAD, please do not link words in any section headings.
Why are there two scope rows in the first "Cabinet Secretary of the Empire of Vietnam (1945)" table, there should only be one scope rows, as per MOS:ACCESS guidelines

There are not two-scope rows; I even failing to see the difference between that table and the others. --TIAYN (talk) 05:50, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done The "Chairman of the Provisional Revolutionary Government of the Republic of South Vietnam (1969–1976)" table does not meet WP:ACCESS, that "Chairman of the Provisional Revolutionary Government (1969–1976)"'s formatting doesn't, please use table captions instead, per MOS:DTT and MOS:ACCESS
Same goes for the "Chairmen of the Council of Ministers (1981–1992)" of a different table, and "Prime Ministers (1992–present)"

I have no clue what you mean... If what you're saying is that I should break up the section Prime Minister of Vietnam into two, then no... Its organised the same way in the General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union --TIAYN (talk) 05:50, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Don't "shout" in reference titles
Done "Staff writer" is strange, remove it, as it is unknown, it should be kept blank. That is unnecessary and redundant.

TBr and ley 01:41, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll fix this (and more if there is more) on friday or saturday, okay??? --TIAYN (talk) 17:41, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

I think there's much more repetition in the lead than is necessary. A good copy-editer could likely turn it into much less dull of a read. (WP:GOCE) Some examples:
- Done "he is ranked he is third in the Political Bureau (Politburo) ranking"
- Done "elects the prime minister. The prime minister is responsible"
- Done "to the National Assembly, and the Assembly elects"
Done "has been 8 prime ministers" (WP:NUMERAL)
"According to the Prime Minister's website" – Why do we need this?
- Because its official conformation. --TIAYN (talk) 09:23, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - That doesn't explain to me why we need the in-text attribution, but fine, it's a minor point anyway.
Done "the modern office of the Prime Minister traces its lineage back to Hồ Chí Minh" – Is there also a dated office of the Prime Minister?
Done "office of the Prime Minister" – Shouldn't this be the "Office of the Prime Minister"?
Done Why no link to South Vietnam?
Done Why are there two "No." columns in some tables?
The one em dash in one of the "Rank" columns makes me curious. Could an explanatory note be added?

This is explained. See the notes. --TIAYN (talk) 09:23, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Which one?

Beneath the column No. on all the tables: [note 2] --TIAYN (talk) 10:51, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[note 2] doesn't explain what an em dash in the "Rank" column means. I suppose Phạm Văn Đồng had no rank at that time, but I'd like to understand why or how that occurred.

Done The last table in particular is in violation of MOS:DTT.

Explain.. --TIAYN (talk) 09:23, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done "Do not place column headers in the middle of a table to visually separate the table." Please see MOS:DTT for details.

Though not mandated by guidelines, please consider using fewer col- and rowspans for the benefit of our readers using text-only browsers or screen readers.

Explain. --TIAYN (talk) 10:51, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see User:RexxS/Accessibility. Minor concessions to visual appeal can greatly improve the reading experience for users of text-only browsers or screen readers.

For now, I'll have to ~~oppose~~ promotion of this list. Good raise 07:36, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revisited. Good raise 10:44, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural comment: FLC isn't peer review. By listing an article at FLC you make the implicit claim that it meets the featured list criteria, which includes complying "with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages." Reviewers are not here to give you step-by-step instructions on how to improve the article or to explain content guidelines and policies to you. Rather, it was your responsibility to have read and understood relevant guidelines and policies beforehand and to have made sure the article met those requirements before listing it here. I'll gladly answer all your questions relating to my comments, provided you at least read the pages to which I'm pointing you. Moreover, it is not enough to fix the examples I give. You'll have to identify and fix similar problems in the article as well. Good raise 08:16, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have never had these problems with other FL nominations; such as those with column and violation of MOS:DTT... That is why I have been asking these questions. --TIAYN (talk) 08:41, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More comments

Done There's two stray "]" in the article. Easily fixed, but one really shouldn't find these kind of flaws in featured list candidates.
Done I'm also not happy with how the scope of the article is defined in the first sentences and then expanded in the last paragraph.
Done The "Rank" columns seem out of place. As properties of the politicians' holding the respective office rather than of the office itself, it would seem to make more sense to place those columns after the "Name" and "Portrait" columns.

I disagree on the grounds that I think its better for readability for having them there. Secondly, the General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam and Chairman of the National Assembly of Vietnam were accepted without any fuss on where the rank column was placed. --TIAYN (talk) 08:41, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done [note 2] confuses me. From what it says, I'd expect the first number to be higher, not lower than the second.

Remaining ~~opposed~~. Good raise 08:16, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The reviewer is not responding... --TIAYN (talk) 17:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My concerns were not addressed to my satisfaction. As it stands, the best I can do is strike my oppose. Support this nomination, I can not. Good raise 18:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, but you have to say what is not good enough so that I can fix it; it doesn't help me if you just say its not good enough.. How can I further improve the article??? --TIAYN (talk) 18:37, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm giving you advice, but not because I'm under any kind of obligation. Read the guidelines. Fix not only the examples I gave, but the issues they exemplify. Make the list clearly define its scope. And have a decent copy-editor work on the prose. Good raise 21:20, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm having troubles why you are not supporting because I've done everything you've told, but okay. --TIAYN (talk) 17:35, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done At least for myself I am waiting for you to remove the excess "scope=row" from the presidency column in 1969–1976. If that is the sole issue Goodraise is asking for, I am not certain of. The colspan in 1981–1992 will also make that table incomprehensible with a text-only browser. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:49, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed all the scope things.. Better??? --TIAYN (talk) 06:45, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Goodraise is not responding, and I'm not sire what he thinks I should fix... What should I do?? --TIAYN (talk) 11:29, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.