Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Prime Ministers of Canada/archive1

Prime Ministers of Canada

Added images, adjusted column widths. Phoenix2 04:57, August 22, 2005 (UTC)

• Comment -- I'd be a little more comfortable supporting if the state acronyms are defined somewhere in the page. =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:29, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Has been addressed. Phoenix2 04:36, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
    • Would also like to see jguk's colour coding issue resolved. =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:17, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Object
  1. The image Image:Kim Campbell.jpg is used under "fair use", but no source or fair use rationale is supplied. See Wikipedia:Fair use and Wikipedia:Image description page#Fair use rationale for what needs to be included.
  2. The image Image:Paulmartin1.jpg is used under "fair use" and "Canadian crown copyright", but neither set of rules has been followed. There is no source information, and no fair use rationale.

  --Carnildo 07:13, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

• Support - subject to the image concerns being addressed. But I agree with User:Nichalp about explaining or linking the abbreviations (although the {{Canadian First Ministers}} helps). -- ALoan (Talk) 17:33, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Comments I agree with Nichalp about expanding the acronyms for the provinces, which aren't familiar to people outside North America. Also some explanation of the red and blue colours on the left hand side of the table would be useful. A brief description in the introduction about the significance of the prime ministership of Canada would also help: I think they are heads of government and have the most senior political post in Canada (with the GG being obliged by constitutional practice to accept any advice given by the PM). Is this right? Is the Time almanack the best reference, rather than say an official website of the Canadian PM? A link to the latter would be useful regardless, jguk 19:02, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Additional link and reference have been provided. Phoenix2 04:36, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
• as to the red a blue on the left side designating the party, is it neccessary with the seperate party column? User:Say1988
  • I think it's OK as is, if you want to change it go ahead, welcome to Wikipedia. Phoenix2 18:34, August 28, 2005 (UTC)