Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Judy Garland awards and honors/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by User:The Rambling Man 13:42, 13 July 2008 [1].
List of Judy Garland awards and honors edit
I believe this list now satisfies Featured List criteria. Otto4711 (talk) 16:13, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment
- Can you make the columns for each table the same widths please?
- I don't know how to do that, but if you can point me toward some instructions I'll do it.
- A good Samaritan has made the table sizes uniform. Otto4711 (talk) 22:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Other honors is basically a bullet pointed (nearly) trivia section. Prose is the way forward.
The Rambling Man (talk) 17:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Huh. I put it in that format because another editor said that the article wasn't listy enough. Otto4711 (talk) 17:45, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, I've prosed up the other honors section and pulled the bullet points. I acknowledge that some of these are a bit on the trivial side but since they are reliably sourced I saw no harm in including them. If there are any that would prevent the list from being promoted I can see my way clear to having them removed. Otto4711 (talk) 17:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- "Album Cover - Non" requires an em dash per WP:DASH.
- Remove the bold formatting from the "Other honors" section.
Gary King (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Matthew
Comments
- Please write a more engaging first sentence instead of "This is a list of awards and honors bestowed upon Judy Garland." Articles don't begin with "This is an article about <subject>", and neither should lists.
- I modeled it on the Featured List of 50 Cent awards which starts "This is a comprehensive list of awards and nominations won by 50 Cent, an American rapper."
- You have to remember that things move forward over time. The 50 Cent awards list was promoted some time ago. The criteria has since changed, and there has been some discussions at WT:FLC about introducing lists in this manner (though you might have to go into "Archive 3" to find it. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 00:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "Bestowed" sounds like they were forced upon her whether she wanted them or not!
- "twice nominated" or "nominated twice"?
- Means the same thing either way.
- Instead of the "Award" column being "Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress", it should just be called "category", and then remove the "Academy Award for" part, because that's mentioned already in the section heading. Same for all other award-giving bodies
- I made an edit regarding heading sizes as it was easier to do than explain!
Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 08:50, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ideally, all columns should be the same width, so in each table, "Nominated work" would be the same width, "Award" should be the same width, etc
- I don't know how to set column widths.
Comments
- "Garland won or was nominated for awards for her work in motion pictures, television, recording and on stage." Isn't anything on TV or film recorded anyway? Why mention this?
- "Recording" refers to music recording.
- Make it clear. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 01:56, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Added the word "music."
- You said you modelled this on List of 50 Cent awards, the infobox should be similar. Other award lists do this, too. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 01:56, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Question
This is the first list I've tried to promote. Does the fixing of the various concerns that y'all have raised mean that you support promotion or is there something else I need to be doing? Otto4711 (talk) 00:56, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Every WP:FLC will stand for at least ten-days. User:The Rambling Man is a director of FLC, and it is rare that he will add a "Support" or "oppose" !vote due to WP:COI reasons. Unless I think it is clear-cut, I usually wait until the end of the ten-day period before !voting. Even though my issues may have been resolved someone else may come along and post things that need to be resolved. I'd hate to see something promoted if I have already supported and the issues stand unresolved at closing. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 01:56, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. Seems very nice. I'll Support. --Meldshal42 (talk to me) 13:21, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.