Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Giro d'Italia general classification winners/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 17:56, 26 July 2011 [1].

List of Giro d'Italia general classification winners edit

Featured list candidates/List of Giro d'Italia general classification winners/archive1
Featured list candidates/List of Giro d'Italia general classification winners/archive2

Nominator(s): NapHit (talk) 20:21, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because now that the Grand Tour general classification winners list has been promoted I can re-nominate this list, sorry for listing it before when I had another list I was unaware of that rule. Anyway, the list has dealt with the problem from the previous nom, which was of verifiability of teams, which is now rectified. Cheers NapHit (talk) 20:21, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support At the previous nomination, I was the only opposer, and my reason was that there was no source for the team information. Since then, this source has been added; as all my other points were already solved in the previous nomination, I now fully support this list. --EdgeNavidad (Talk · Contribs) 20:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~ Support – Reviewed this the first time and my comments were taken care of there; ~~the only things I want to point out are that "french" should be capitalized for the reference 8 language indication, and the hyphen in reference 19 should be an en dash.~~ Giants2008 (27 and counting) 03:11, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments Giants, they've both been dealt with. NapHit (talk) 10:24, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 19:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"speed of 38.937 kilometres per hour" do we really need that level of accuracy?

I'll take the 7 off as in most bike races they use the first two digits after the decimal, so that should be enough. NapHit (talk) 19:04, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Probably worth linking lire as some of our non-European readers may not understand what that is at all.
"Bartali's superiority was diminished " not keen on this phrase at all.
Shouldn't "20 year old" be hyphenated?
I think the "not contested" should sort as the minimum of each column, not the maximum.
Not sure "Not contested" should sort by N in the rider name column.
Is bikeraceinfo.com a reliable source?

the editors of the site have had numerous books published about cycling, which uses the data from their site, therefore I think this deems the site reliable. NapHit (talk) 19:04, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What makes [2] a reliable source?

Not sure so I've removed the links and replaced them with sources that are reliable. NapHit (talk) 19:04, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For future situations: memoire-du-cyclisme can be considered a reliable source. It is backed by an organisation, the members are not anonymous, the content is not user-generated (except the forums), there is contact information, and the information is regarded highly accurate in the cycling community. You don't need to change it back, because the new source is also reliable. --EdgeNavidad (Talk · Contribs) 22:47, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

13-digit ISBNs are preferable if available (according to Amazon, both those with 10-digit ISBNs have 13-digit ones too...)

The Rambling Man (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review TRM, I've dealt with all your concerns. NapHit (talk) 19:04, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support The Rambling Man (talk) 19:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.