Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Dallas Landmarks/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 22:54, 20 January 2010 [1].

List of Dallas Landmarks edit

Nominator(s): Dfwcre8tive (talk) 19:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Featured list candidates/List of Dallas Landmarks/archive1

I am nominating this for featured list because the new list was created to highlight Landmark structures and districts in Dallas that were previously not mentioned. I created the list to better categorize and distinguish Dallas Landmarks from other historic designations. Dfwcre8tive (talk) 19:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Transcluded Dabomb87 (talk) 15:22, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments - suggest this is withdrawn and reintroduced when, as a minimum, the following is fixed:

All references should use the {{cite web}} template, or similar, not just be bare URLs.
The lead is expanded appropriately. One short paragraph is insufficient for a list with this many entries.
The table is fixed (and probably made sortable) - look at line 2 (starts Structure...)
Images need alt text.
Disambiguation links need to be fixed.

The Rambling Man (talk) 14:26, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dabs; please check the disambiguation links identified in the toolbox. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:00, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Is there a reason why some of the words in the "Current Use" column are in italics?
The "Designation Date", "Current Use", "NRHP Date" and "RTHL Date" look incomplete, is there a reason as to why there are so many empty columns?
Redlinks seem to be overused.

Afro (Not a Talk Page) ^{- Afkatk} 08:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - I'm going to oppose this article as no effort has seemed to be made to improve this article at all since December 29, the only addition to this article has been a bot. Afro (Not a Terrible Joke) ^{- Afkatk} 10:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.