Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Julia Michaels discography/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [1].

---

Julia Michaels discography

Julia Michaels discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/Julia Michaels discography/archive1

Nominator(s): NØ 00:43, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Julia Michaels is a songwriter-turned-singer (I know, I have a type lol) whose career was so screwed over by record label politics that she was stuck releasing EPs instead of albums through most of it. I've put a lot of work into this discography, and it might just be my best list yet! Thanks a lot to everyone who will take the time to give their feedback here, and after gaining some confidence I'll try do QPQs for this one :) --NØ 00:43, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Comments

• "She released her self-titled debut EP in 2010 and the second one, Futuristic" => "She released her self-titled debut EP in 2010 and a second, Futuristic"
• Sophie Muller has an article, so can be linked
• Think that's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:43, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

• Both done. Thanks for the swift review! Hope you are having a great week so far.--NØ 17:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Pseud 14

I could not find any issues with the prose, I do have some minor (nitpick-y) comments on the references (note that this is not a full source review)

• Since you have quite a few sources that require paid subscription, suggest adding a flag (subscription required) per Template:Subscription required

• I've utilized "subscription=limited" instead and I would guess the use of both might be redundant.

• I would recommend archiving citations (i.e. some Billboard charts history aren't archived while most citations are). It is not required for a FLC, but I think it would be helpful to avoid any future headaches with link rot and death, as well as for consistency.

• Odd that the bot isn't picking these up. I've manually added archives to some of these.

• That's all from me. Hope this helps. Pseud 14 (talk) 18:06, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

• Thank you for the review, Pseud 14! This was very helpful indeed and I have actioned your comments.--NØ 20:35, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

• Support --Pseud 14 (talk) 20:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Source review

I'm unfamiliar with a lot of the article's sources, so alert me if I screw anything up. Version reviewed

Formatting

• I believe Rolling Stone's url-access is limited, not subscription
• fn 109: is "NYLA" an acronym? If not, then it should probably be reduced from all caps per MOS:ALLCAPS

• Seems to maybe stand for New York & Los Angeles.

• Per MOS:CONFORMTITLE, be consistent with the citation titles' capitalisation; either use title-case (refer to MOS:5LETTER) or sentence-case

• Should be consistently all caps now except few certification template-generated refs that produce the words "single certifications" in lowercase

Reliability

• What makes the following high-quality reliable sources:
  • Atwood Magazine

• They seem to have a lot of editors and are used to source fairly uncontroversial claims here.

• • auspOp

• Seems to be the only source covering certain editions of the Australian chart, commonly in use on proactively maintained high-profile FLs like Taylor Swift singles discography, Lady Gaga discography and Rihanna singles discography.

• • Stereogum

• James Rettig, the author used, has written for Billboard, Spin, iHeartRadio, etc.

• • Uproxx

• Reputed source with multiple editors

• • All Access Music Group

• Adds on All Access come directly from record labels and it is thus a premium source to cite single releases, recommended for making the distinction between singles and promotional singles per WP:SINGLESCRIT.

• • Idolator

• Reliable source per WP:RSPSS and Mike Wass has written for Billboard, Variety and Yahoo!, etc. Citing Billboard itself would have been my first preference but they seem to have erroneously referred to this song as a "single" instead of the more accurate "promotional single".

• • Sounds Like Nashville

• Not that familiar with the site but Chris Parton has written for the Rolling Stone, CMT and Taste of Country, etc. and seems to be a Country music journalist in good standing

Verifiability

• Spotchecks clear

I think that's it from me! Ping me in any replies. Pamzeis (talk) 06:16, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Much thanks for the review, Pamzeis. Responses above. Cheers!--NØ 07:57, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Hey Pamzeis, does the source review pass after the explanations for reliability? Regards.--NØ 03:35, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

• Sorry for wait. I think that's a pass from me! Pamzeis (talk) 05:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

MyCatIsAChonk

Support- Can't see any issues, very nice work! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 19:09, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

• Image review – The lead photo (the only one in the article) has an appropriate free license and alt text. No issues here. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:23, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.