Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daya discography/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Daya discography edit

Daya discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): NØ 04:22, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discography of American singer Daya. As you will see, the girl is a bit of a flop, especially nowadays... It's been a while since I've done this so please bear with me on anything obvious and I'll be proactive in fixing it. Thanks a lot to everyone who will take the time to give their feedback here.--NØ 04:22, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisTheDude edit

  • In the interest of not simply supporting without picking anything up, I'll note that "went top 10 in several other countries" is ever so slightly slangy/journalese and I would suggest changing it to "reach the top 10 in several other countries". That's it, though! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:24, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Addressed! Much thanks for giving this list a read, ChrisTheDude :) --NØ 14:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pseud 14 edit

Nice to see you back in the FLC space. I still think "Sit Still, Look Pretty" since the first time I've heard it. It's unfortunate that her career hasn't taken off since.

  • and it earned a Gold certification in the former country. -- earning a Gold certification in the former; I think it can do without country or you could state RIAA being the certifying body (that works too, but would be a longer read.).
  • Done.
  • The album was additionally supported by the single "Words" (2016). -- perhaps you could say a second single, "Word", was released in 2016 or somewhere along those lines.
  • There's some purposeful ambiguity here because both "Hide Away" and "Sit Still, Look Pretty" were included on the EP as well. I haven't been able to find secondary sources clarifying whether they consider "Words" the third, second or lead single from the album.
  • That makes sense. Thanks for clarifying. In that case the current woring wording fine.
  • I think that's it from me. The tables seem to be in good order. Wonderful work. Pseud 14 (talk) 14:52, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. If you have some spare time, hoping I could get your input in my FLC  :) Pseud 14 (talk) 16:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dank edit

  • Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
  • Two of the Sverigetopplistan links need to be identified as Swedish-language links, and the FIMI link is in Italian. The German and Dutch links also need this. (I can't evaluate the foreign-language links.) One Sverigetopplistan link and the Instagram link need retrieval dates. Also, source reviewers may want to look at the Instagram, Twitter and Dropbox links; I'm not sure how to evaluate these. I'm not sure what the requirements are for "partial subscription needed" and "subscription needed" tags.
  • Checking the FLC criteria:
  • 1. You've got two prose reviews so far; I'll skip that part. There are no sortable columns. I sampled the links in the tables.
  • 2. Otherwise, the lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
  • 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
  • 3b. I didn't find any sourcing or retrieval-date problems except as noted above. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any other problems (but this isn't a source review).
  • 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
  • 4. It is navigable.
  • 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the one image seems fine.
  • 6. It is stable. - Dank (push to talk) 22:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks a lot for accepting my request, Dank!! This really is a big help. All issues fixed. The Instagram and Twitter sources are Daya's own personal accounts that I have used in a generally acceptable and uncontroversial way. As for ARIA releasing their certifications on Dropbox, it has always been bizarre but that is just the way it is unfortunately.--NØ 22:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Glad I could help. I anticipate supporting after I have a look at what the source reviewer(s) say(s). - Dank (push to talk) 23:18, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The social media sources are WP:ABOUTSELF, most appropriate thing we could use for single designation in absence of secondary sources, and the Dropbox link is literally the only place Australian certifications are uploaded, linked on their official website and in use on proactively maintained high-profile FLCs like Taylor Swift singles discography but whatever floats your boat.--NØ 00:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • That sounds reasonable to me. I'm mainly trying to communicate with whoever does the source review ... I'm saying that I've covered a lot of it, but there are things I haven't covered because they go past what I know. - Dank (push to talk) 19:20, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source review by MyCatIsAChonk edit

Seems like you've justified the social media sources above, so I won't worry about those. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 14:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • MOS:CONFORMTITLE, the citation titles should be all title case (seeing as most are already that way). Only one I can spot is refs 61 and 68, but there may be others.

MaranoFan, can't spot any others formatting or reliability issues. Nice job. Spotcheck below, choosing refs at random. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 14:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ref 3 (Weatherby 2017): good
  • Ref 6 (Leight 2016): good
  • Ref 10 (Sverigetopplistan): The link just goes to the singles list, which shows this week's top singles- the link should go to a page in their archives. Ref does not content.
  • Ref 12 (Lipshutz 2021): good
  • Ref 14 (Daya Chart History, Billboard): good
  • Ref 18 (Irish Charts): good
  • Ref 23 (swedishcharts.com): good
  • Ref 27 (Recorded Music NZ): good
  • Ref 34 (ARIA): good
  • Ref 38 (Apple Music AU): good
  • Ref 61 (RIAA): the text says it's certified 9x platinum, source says 10x
  • Ref 71 (Bein 2018): good
  • Ref 75 (Russian 2016): good

Issues with refs 10 and 61. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 15:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the source review, MyCatIsAChonk! A huge relief after how long this nomination has waited. Fixes done on 10 and 61.--NØ 20:07, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support sources- ping for @Dank, since he was waiting on a source review. By the way, if you ever get the time, I got an FLC open here. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 20:12, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Giants2008/PresN I would really like a status update on this nomination. I'm seeing several FLCs promoted within the past year either entirely without a media review or with a coord doing it (including one with a single support and no source review??). Dank is converted to a support now, btw. Kindly help me understand what's needed here. If I am ignored again, I will feel forced to raise a discussion about this.--NØ 23:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • @MaranoFan: I see we have four supports, a source review, and that Dank checked the images. Barring further review, I'd think this is in line for promotion in the next round of closures. Cheers. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:54, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting. --PresN 15:53, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/Daya_discography/archive1&oldid=1169896744"