Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Comparison of VoIP software/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Comparison of VoIP software edit

Featured list candidates/Comparison of VoIP software/archive1

Nominator(s): JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 03:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be honest, I'm quite biased towards this list, as it was the article I made my first non-deleted edit to, but I believe that it is a great list that accurately describes all major VoIP software programs, has sufficient citations, and good prose. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 03:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

There seems to be an awful lot of unsourced content here. There is only one source in the whole of the lead, and many rows in the tables have no sources, for example in the very first row (AudioCodes MobilityPLUS) there is no source to confirm that it was released in 2014, what its other abilities are, what the codecs are, etc. The same is true for many other rows. Overall I think the referencing needs improving to get to FL standard (also, the formatting of the existing refs is a bit all over the place, with multiple different date formats (in some cases within the same reference), many refs having no publisher listed, etc -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:35, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- As an aside, I note that you aren't really a significant contributor to the article (only 11 edits) and don't seem to have consulted with those who are, as required per the rubric at the top of the FLC page......... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:40, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

The lede is underdeveloped, but in a total of five paragraphs...
The "needs expansion" tag makes me think the list is incomplete.
As Chris pointed out, there are some big concerns with the references.

This would need a lot of work... ~ HAL333 18:04, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request withdrawn I'll be honest, I made this nomination without properly understanding the featured list criteria; I really only nominated this because there is no such thing as a "good list", so I'd like this nomination to be procedurally closed in order to move it to peer review. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 18:15, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing; even if there was such a thing as a "Good List", having tags on a list and big parts without references would be an issue, just like it would be for GA. Doing a PR is a great next step; feel free to renominate once it's cleaned up. --Pres N 02:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.