Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/79th Academy Awards/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 21:12, 4 May 2014 [1].

79th Academy Awards edit

Featured list candidates/79th Academy Awards/archive1

Nominator(s): Birdienest81 (talk) 03:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating the 2007 Oscars for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I also followed how the 1929, 1989, 1990, 1992, 1994, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2009, 2010, 2012, and 2013 Oscars were written. Please note that some references were retrieved via Internet Archive.--Birdienest81 (talk) 03:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment "Winners are listed first and highlighted in boldface.[20]"—No they aren't...—indopug (talk) 04:15, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed: Changed to "Winners are listed first and indicated with a double-dagger (‡)."

--Birdienest81 (talk) 04:53, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 00:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments –

Winners and nominees: "Dreamgirls received the most nominations with eight, Babel came in second with seven." Feels like it needs "and" before Babel.
""that the film with the most nomination was not a Best Picture nominee." "nomination" should be plural here.
"Peter O'Toole became the most nominated performer without an competitive win." "an" → "a".
In "to win for a film debut performance", should "film" and "debut" be reversed?
Ceremony information: Architectural Digest should be italicized as a print publication.
In the Pennington quote, you can turn the hyphen into an MoS-friendly en dash and it won't affect the integrity of the quote.
Ratings and reception: You don't really need a J. Michael Riva link here, since there's already one a few sections up. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:31, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done: I fixed everything you mentioned above. Thank you.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 06:38, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reviews: There's a quotation mark missing in the first Alessandra Stanley quote.
- I still don't see the second mark. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done: Added the quotation mark to the first Stanley quote.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 03:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks good as usual. Reywas92^Talk 19:02, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support All good! -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 07:15, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great job, once again.--Jagarin 03:04, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Support Great list!--Earthh (talk) 14:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:45, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.