Wikipedia:Featured article review/Tiridates I of Armenia/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 3:12, 23 April 2022 (UTC) [1].
Tiridates I of Armenia edit
- Notified: Eupator, WikiProject Armenia, WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, WikiProject Military history, WikiProject Iran, WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, WikiProject Zoroastrianism, WikiProject Politics, WikiProject Rome, 18-12-2021
Review section edit
I am nominating this featured article for review because of disorganised references, with some media described in the inline citation and others placed in the bibliography section. There's also works placed in the bibliography that are not used as sources and their quality should be evaluated and considered for inline citation use. The "War with Rome" section has been expanded since its FAC and I think it should be trimmed and summarised. The "Visiting Rome" section has pretty much stayed the same since its FAC, but I also think it can be summarised and trimmed, especially Tiridates and Nero's interaction and the direct quotes. The "Cultural depictions" section is one sentence and uncited. Eponymous-Archon made some improvements after I noticed it in December, but these seemed to have stalled. HistoryofIran commented on the talk page that this article's FA status should be reviewed. Z1720 (talk) 17:43, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC - sourcing needs improved in areas. "Nero was reportedly so impressed by this act that he ordered a gladiatorial games be staged in honor of his guest" should have a secondary source rather than Cassius Dio, the large chunk of a paragraph sourced to the 1842 "Penny Cyclopedia" needs a better source, etc. There's some other areas where Cassius Dio or Tacitus should be replaced by secondary sources and while Smith 1867 is considered useful at times, I would recommend using more modern references instead of the cites to him, as where Smith is dated, it's frequently badly sometimes. Hog Farm Talk 17:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC per HF analysis. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:40, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC per above. (t · c) buidhe 07:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section edit
- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and structure. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, issues unresolved. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, nothing happened since FAR opened and sourcing issues remain. Hog Farm Talk 15:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, no edits since March. Z1720 (talk) 15:55, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:12, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.