Wikipedia:Featured article review/Suburbs of Johannesburg/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by Marskell 17:27, 12 August 2009 [1].
Suburbs of Johannesburg edit
Review commentary edit
- wikiprojects notified. Author has retired
This article has a severe lack of citations, and many subjective comments describing schools/places as "prestigious" etc are not cited. YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) paid editing=POV 14:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary edit
- Suggested FA criteria concern are citations, alt text, POV. Also note the recent change to WP:WIAFA (1c) requiring "high-quality" sources. FAQ? YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) paid editing=POV 01:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, per FA criteria concerns. Cirt (talk) 04:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per self YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) paid editing=POV 07:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist On top of the above, the article is out of date - it mentions and relies upon a system of 11 numbered regions which no longer exists - it was reorganised in 2006 into 7 lettered regions. Orderinchaos 04:39, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist on Orderinchaos' grounds alone, but there's plenty to find non FA-worthy in this article. JKBrooks85 (talk) 06:44, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per concerns. Aaroncrick (talk) 10:55, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per YellowMonkey. Also, article has not been edited in the last three months. And only 2 edits last May. —mattisse (Talk) 16:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.