Wikipedia:Featured article review/Scooby-Doo/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed 12:43, 6 May 2008.

Scooby-Doo edit

Review commentary edit

Notified:WikiProject Television

Concerns:

1 (c) citations are less. Ultra! 14:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eight fair use images is too much per {{non-free}}.

Red links in lists.

IMDb is not a reliable source. Ultra! 14:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Red links don't matter. I cut two of the images, the rest are necessary and explanatory. I also cut the two IMDB references, so the last thing you mentioned was more references, which I will work on, but others feel free to help :) Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:06, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Film posters are also not needed. They are like advertisements if used out of the film article. Ultra! 14:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but we should demonstrate the cast of the live action version, as that is a notable shift in the franchise. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:NFCC again. Fair use is meant for improving reader's understanding only. 2 posters don't, and 2 screenshots of all characters are not needed. Ultra! 15:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So remove animated poster & keep the other. Ultra! 15:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remove US flag. Why does infobox say "See voices below"? Ultra! 15:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because for some reason the voice actors are listed at the bottom of the article, perhaps because whoever did it thought there were too many for the infobox. Aslo I removed the flag and the tv movie poster.Judgesurreal777 (talk) 15:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary edit

Suggested FA criteria concerns are referencing (1c) and images (3). Marskell (talk) 03:28, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually we fixed the images issue, now it just needs a lot more references. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 14:52, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remove 1c and also the citations are of dubiious merit. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:56, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, almost completely uncited, WP:MSH issues, unformatted citations, and missing citations. Apparently an abandoned article. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.