Wikipedia:Featured article review/Paul Kane/archive2

Paul Kane edit

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria at 14:31, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review commentary edit

Featured article candidates/Paul Kane

Notified: Lupo, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Visual arts, WikiProject Biography, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Toronto, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ontario, Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/Arts and entertainment, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ireland

I am nominating this featured article for review because there's a lot sections have no source, or least didn't have enough footnotes, for example: "Travels in the Northwest" (there's three sub-sections below), I feel this is a major problem need to be fixed, doesn't meet the criteria anymore.--Jarodalien (talk) 07:08, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already more than 10 days passed, why there's no reaction? Did I done something wrong or is there anything else I should do? I'm new here, please don't be mad me. I could just withdraw this nomination if necessary.--Jarodalien (talk) 01:47, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jarodalien: These things take time. Everything looks to have been done properly. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:16, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've cleaned up the dead links quite a while ago. Mayb e you did not notice but I don't know anything about the subject to add much more. I'll take another look at it. ww2censor (talk) 23:35, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@TenPoundHammer:, @Ww2censor:. Thank you, and what shall I do next? Or the procedure will keep going, I don't have to do anything? I'm asking this only because is already over a month passed, and I don't have any idea about how long this progress need.--Jarodalien (talk) 16:43, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jarodalien: Just let it run its course mostly. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:43, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary edit

Featured article criteria mentioned in the review section mainly focus on referencing. Dana boomer (talk) 20:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: reference is a major problem, over 50 days passed, basically no improvement.--Jarodalien (talk) 13:22, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per referencing. Tezero (talk) 20:40, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:31, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.