Wikipedia:Featured article review/Mystical Ninja Starring Goemon/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by User:Nikkimaria 08:56, 2 February 2013 [1].
Mystical Ninja Starring Goemon edit
Review commentary edit
- Notified: Zeality, WikiProject Video games
I'm pulling this off of the talk page but my concerns still stand. The first problem I have is the sourcing. Some of them (EX: Sakekan Game Reviews, 64 Lightland) seem to be unreliable. Another issue is the Length. Primarily the Plot section, which contains unnecessary content like an entire section for the Humor in the game.
Its been a while since I've done an FAR so if there's any problems I made please let me know. GamerPro64 15:52, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary edit
- Featured article criteria mentioned in the review section include sourcing and coverage. Dana boomer (talk) 17:57, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per issues listed above. I've cut down the humor section and merged it into the reception section, but more work needs to be done on that score. I don't think that the article as written supports all the nonfree content used within it; I see an argument for a screenshot demonstrating the graphics and a music sample to add to the discussion of its unusual style commented upon, but the rest probably need an audit. I'll work on what I can when I have time but that's not going to be enough to pass all FA criteria. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 19:01, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per David Fuchs's reasonings. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 20:28, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - Per the issues I addressed. GamerPro64 17:46, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:56, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.