Wikipedia:Featured article review/Muhammad Iqbal

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 00:23, 14 April 2009 [1].

Muhammad Iqbal edit

Review commentary edit

An older FA promoted in July 2006, no longer up to current standards. Mainly 1c issues throughout. Cirt (talk) 02:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: User talk:Rama's Arrow is full-protected, no contributions by user since 2007. Cirt (talk) 02:41, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam/Muslim scholars task force, Wikipedia talk:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics, Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. Cirt (talk) 02:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean it needs more referencing or needs to be expanded? --→ Ãlways Ãhëad (talk) 02:58, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The former. Cirt (talk) 03:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image problems

Apart from the pictures of the tomb, all the images were created more than fifty years ago. However, in Pakistan images become public domain fifty years after publication, not creation, so ideally we need details of when they were first published, or at least some proof that they were published more than fifty years ago. DrKiernan (talk) 14:28, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary edit

Suggested FA criteria concern is citations and image copyrights. Also note the recent change to WP:WIAFA (1c) requiring "high-quality" sources. YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 05:21, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delist issues with criterion 1c persist. It would be wonderful if we could get some editors to work on bringing Iqbal back to FA status. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 03:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, per FA criteria concerns. Cirt (talk) 04:01, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.