Wikipedia:Featured article review/Marine shrimp farming/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by User:Nikkimaria 19:40, 21 January 2015 [1].
Marine shrimp farming edit
- Notified: Lupo, Epipelagic, Stemonitis, WP Agriculture, WP Fisheries and Fishing
- URFA nom
- Talk page notification 2012
Review section edit
This is a 2005 FA that has not been maintained. There is considerable uncited text, the article (data) is outdated, and there are numerous MOS issues to be addressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I have to agree. This doesn't even meet modern Good Article standards. HalfGig talk 03:21, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Depressing to delist, as it's a decent little article but I agree at present that it lacks sourcing. There may have been a 2009 update of data, that factor not enough by itself to mandeate delisting. Looks like several editors have been pinged about this, and I added one more person who might have an interest. Let's give it the usual time to run, maybe someone will take a whack at improving it. If not, oh well, but if there is work started, I would be glad to see this article brought up to snuff. Montanabw(talk) 00:24, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC, two weeks, nothing happening. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section edit
- Concerns raised in the review section largely centered on sourcing and datedness. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not a single edit since listed at FAR, but I will wait a week before declaring Delist. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:06, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, no progress whatsoever. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 11:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, no edits in 2015 at all at the time of writing – nothing being done to address the clear problems. BencherliteTalk 16:18, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, no progress. --Laser brain (talk) 15:13, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:38, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.