Wikipedia:Featured article review/European Parliament/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 0:42, 24 December 2021 (UTC) [1].
European Parliament edit
- Notified: JLogan, Rossella Vignola (OBC), Boson, Arkhandar, WP EU, WP Politics, Noticed in April 2021
Review section edit
There's a little bit of uncited text, some dated material/statistics/sources, and a lack of scholarly assessment. Hog Farm Talk 04:30, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - This is a tough one for me. I think I'll defer to those who have better knowledge about the European Parliament. GoodDay (talk) 04:43, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Buidhe noted on talk:
- Beyond unsourced statements, the article relies too much on official sources and news reports without much in the way of academic analysis.
- Balance also seems to be an issue. While it has a long paragraph on "European Parliament Mediator for International Parental Child Abduction" there is nothing to be heard about Euroskepticism,[2][3][4] or the many other issues discussed in academic sources[5]
SandyGeorgia (Talk) 11:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Updating is also a concern. In recent years a major issue is the rule-of-law crisis in Poland and Hungary, in which the EP has been noted to take a much harder line than the Commission and Council. This issue has led to power struggles between EU institutions including an unprecedented lawsuit by the Parliament against the Commission but is not discussed in this article. (t · c) buidhe 00:31, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC issues still present (t · c) buidhe 03:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, not much happening. Hog Farm Talk 19:30, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section edit
- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and coverage. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist Tagged as needing clarification. DrKay (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, needed improvements have not occurred. Hog Farm Talk 15:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, improvements have not happened. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:15, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist: recent edits have been minor, more drastic improvements are needed. Z1720 (talk) 18:24, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:42, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.