Wikipedia:Featured article review/End times/archive1

End times edit

Review commentary edit

Message left at Religion and Christianity. Sandy (Talk) 16:20, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant prose promotion, no original author. This article is poorly referenced, has an inadequate lead, does not conform to WP:LAYOUT, is poorly arranged with large chunks of white text, has a factual accuracy tag, has short choppy sections, is extremely listy, and has external jumps. Sandy (Talk) 16:20, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This article is poorly referenced, has an inadequate lead, does not conform to WP:LAYOUT, is poorly arranged with large chunks of white text, has a factual accuracy tag, has short choppy sections, is extremely listy per Sandy's nom. LuciferMorgan 19:36, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not happy with the prose at the clause level. "has evolved from use around a group of beliefs"—what does it mean? Deictics are missing in quite a few places, e.g., "has ensued following publication of"—THE publication of. Needs a good run-through. Tony 00:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary edit

Suggested FA criteria concerns are referencing, LEAD, NPOV, section layout and prose. Joelito (talk) 14:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remove I think there is no chance for this to be saved. Joelito (talk) 14:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Insufficient inline cites. LuciferMorgan 19:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Amount of work required to keep this at FA level is such that there's no way it'll all get done anytime soon. Badbilltucker 00:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. As it is now the article is faaaaar away from FA status. Per all above.--Yannismarou 22:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Lacking in-line citations, listy sections, and so on.UberCryxic 18:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]