Wikipedia:Featured article review/Delhi/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 06:32, 26 May 2010 [1].

Delhi edit

Review commentary edit

Featured article review/Delhi/archive1

Notified: User talk:Dwaipayanc, User talk:Nikkul, User talk:Lostintherush, Cities WP, India WP

I am nominating this featured article for review because it is a 2007 FA that has not been reviewed since, and is currently sitting near the top of Wikipedia:Featured articles/Cleanup listing. There are citation needed tags sprinkled through the article and some external links are present in the body of the article rather than being used as references or in the external links section. There is at least one dead link and many of the references are not formatted properly, missing publishers (or having incorrectly listed publishers), access dates and other information. I also have concerns about the article meeting the high quality sources criteria, as there are many websites and general references being used, while many reliable, scholarly books have been written on the topic. Dana boomer (talk) 02:23, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article is fine. It is a model Featured City Article. There ARE some improvements which are needed, but in terms of structure and content, this article is one of the best in wikipedia. Nikkul (talk) 07:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You clearly need to read WP:WIAFA. dana's one of the directors of the FAR process, so I would trust Dana's judgment when it comes to a FA in need of reassessment. The source quality in particular is of concern. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 22:16, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary edit

Featured article criterion of concern are sourcing YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 01:25, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delist No effort has been made to fix the problems Dana listed. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:39, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist No effort had been made to address my concerns, especially those about high quality sourcing. Dana boomer (talk) 20:14, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist — No effort in improving the article. Aaroncrick ^TALK 06:30, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.