Wikipedia:Featured article review/Canadian federal election, 1993/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by Raul654 00:09, 15 March 2010 [1].
Canadian federal election, 1993 edit
Review commentary edit
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: WikiProjects and author
This article lacks citations in many sections, particuarly in attribution reasons and motives for actions by voters and politicians. Secondly some of these describe BLP politicians, often describing their actions negatively YellowMonkey (Southern Stars photo poll) 06:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Please add alt text to images; see WP:ALT. Eubulides (talk) 08:08, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Media review
- File:Chretien crop Sept 9 2002.jpg: minor point: the source is a dead link.
- File:Bouchard4.jpg: copyrighted image hosted on commons with an attribution license but tagged as missing essential source information because the source is a dead link and there's no evidence of permission.
- File:Audrey McLaughlin.jpg: no fair use rationale. Living person: fair use may not apply.
- File:Kim Campbell bw.jpg: no fair use rationale. Living person: fair use may not apply.
- I'm not fully convinced by the use of the logos. If they are used then they should at least be the same size.
- The front page of the Globe and Mail is not used in any critical commentary. DrKiernan (talk) 11:33, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary edit
- Featured article criterion of concern are citations and images YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:26, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist nothing happened except some images were switched YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 23:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per above, absolutely nothing happened during FAR so I doubt anyone will try to improve during FARC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist I actually came on this one while starting my push to get Canadian federal election, 1957 to FA. I was struck at how poor this article, which I planned to use as a blueprint, was. It does not meet FA standards. Incidentally, my 1957 efforts are to squeeze out another FA from my John Diefenbaker materials, I don't have anything on 1993 and can't help.--Wehwalt (talk) 00:30, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, significant referencing issues, substandard for FA material. Cirt (talk) 17:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.