Wikipedia:Featured article review/Adriaen van der Donck/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by Dana boomer 01:19, 1 May 2010 [1].

Adriaen van der Donck edit

Review commentary edit

Featured article candidates/Adriaen van der Donck

Featured article review/Adriaen van der Donck/archive1

Notified: Wikiprojects. Author inactive.

This article fails 1c because of a vast lack of citations in many paragraphs YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 03:48, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes. 7 citations the whole article? That's ridiculous. Process, schmosess — delist this puppy now. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:24, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You mean 17, yes? But it's not enough. Johnbod (talk) 23:45, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Serious lack of sources, yadda yadda, one was dead so I tagged it, threw in a couple [citation needed]s...egregious lack of sourcing all around. Did I mention the lack of sources? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 15:34, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary edit

Featured article criterion of concern is referencing YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 02:32, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delist per nominating statement YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 02:32, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per lack of sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 22:35, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.