Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sistine Chapel ceiling/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 01:38, 29 September 2007.

Sistine Chapel ceiling edit

'self-nomThis article of top importance has been entirely rewritten and fully referenced by an art historian, incorporating earlier input. It has many new pics and two diagrams created for the article. Amandajm 07:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The restoration section is literally empty. It should include at least a summery of the other article. Raul654 14:06, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done added summary and cited refs Amandajm 14:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support This has undergone an excellent expansion. Great work. JNW 03:29, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment (Conditional oppose): there are no page numbers for any of the references, which makes them as a practical matter nearly unverifiable. Also, could you make a separate notes and references section, because many sentences appear to be referenced when they just have a note instead (which is also often unreferenced)? Calliopejen1 20:31, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply OK, will get onto this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amandajm (talk • contribs) 13:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:You seem to have nominated a lot of pages recently claiming they are written by architectural or art historians. I find this concerning as I see no well known architectural historians in the history. Bearing in mind that Wikipedia has to be beyond reproach in its claims - I would like to know who these people are and their proven qualifications (or list of publications) to be so termed. If these facts are not available I don't think the claim of qualified authorship should be made. I have commented in full on only one of your nominations as I feel you should concentrate on one page at a time. Multiple nominations are discouraged. Giano 13:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ResponseI'm overwhelmed! Amdit foolishness of putting up to many articles in one go! withdraw this one.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.