Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Programming language/archive1

Programming language edit

Self-nom. Around the same time as becoming computer science collaboration of the week, this article has undergone some good reorganization and clarification to follow summary style and add precision in its writing. I think it's gotten to the point of providing an excellent overview of its topic. LotLE×talk 18:07, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object. Why are you nominating this? Its still got the COTW tag! Lead is way too short, and the article doesn't go into much detail for the subject(s) it covers - Also the refs/footnotes are very scarce. — Wackymacs 18:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An article must be stable if it is to be awarded the featured status, with it being an active COTW it is not stable. — Wackymacs 19:07, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We were hoping to provide a hub intro that is not too long with links to other main articles. If you prefer, we can integrate the material from the linked to articles here. Ideogram 14:19, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's officially out of COTW. We forgot to remove the tag. Ideogram 17:49, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Wackymacs. Also, article seems to have unsourced statements. Pepsidrinka 01:35, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We have fixed the unsourced statements issue. Ideogram 22:37, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object - ~~At least let it finish its Collaboration first.~~ --ZeWrestler ^Talk 13:58, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As Ideogram comments, the article is not now COTW; in fact, it had the tag a little while after it was not formally in the right week. The other comments are helpful, but let's treat the COTW thing as in the past. LotLE×talk 18:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i crossed out the comment, but i think the article needs a peer review before its going to be ready for FA status.--ZeWrestler ^Talk 15:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]