Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Manila Metro Rail Transit System Line 3

Manila Metro Rail Transit System Line 3 edit

PR: May 2006
LRT (sister article): PR, FAC

Well, this is a second FAC for me (so this is really a self-nomination). A side project at first, as I then focused my energies on the then-emerging Manila Light Rail Transit System, which is now a featured article, I have put plenty of time, effort, energy and sweat on this article, which I have worked on for over a year now. I may have not started this article from scratch, unlike the LRT, but I do feel that it's ready for FA status. Like the LRT, suggestions are highly welcome. --Akira123323 ^{Say what? |} ^{Track record} 09:56, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support as nominator. --Akira123323 ^{Say what? |} ^{Track record} 09:56, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support but try to improve Look for things which may be criticized and put them up on debate Justox dizaola 09:59, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 2nd edit made---Justox dizaola 12:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
SupportOppose Sections like the Network (which should be easy) and the History (which could be harder) need sources badly. Also, while not grounds for an oppose, could you take a better shot than Image:Shaw Boulevard.jpg if you have the ability? It's just a very... ugly photo (not trying to sound mean) Staxringold _talk^contribs 20:10, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I really hate camera phone pictures taken inside a car. I replaced it with Image:MRTAyala Station.JPG instead. And I added in my resources. So in essence, both things are done.--Akira123323 ^{Say what? |} ^{Track record} 21:44, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vote changed, though more detailed referencing for History and Network would be better. Staxringold _talk^contribs 00:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support. --Howard t he Du c k 13:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am 100% supporting the nomination. --Glenncando 09:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Needs a few more images though. --Mithril Cloud 16:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]