Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/History of the battery/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 06:17, 31 January 2007.
History of the battery edit
- Nominated by User:Kurzon. Gzkn 03:55, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose even without a nomination statement or signature from a nominator; as it needs more references and the intro is too short. Daniel Case 02:12, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Good start, but you should probably let the peer review run its course. Gzkn 04:00, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. Lead is too short, some sections have no references, peer review is only 1 day old. I would suggest withdrawing this nomination, at least until the peer review is complete and its suggestions have been implemented. Kaldari 05:54, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose, per above. Phoenix2 06:43, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose, per above. Try GA. Rlevse 12:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- OBJECT. Not ready. I echo the above reasons. Also, remove the size/pixel parameters from the thumbnailed images to accomodate user preferences. —ExplorerCDT 20:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Object. While the article does have some references, a lot more are needed! -- Underneath-it-All 20:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose This article doesn't give enough information and is in a way choppy to read. It is more of a timeline then an article. Chickyfuzz123(user talk) 02:32, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.