Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Form IV: Ataru (Lightsaber combat)

Form IV: Ataru (Lightsaber combat) edit

Its direct, referenced were it needs to be and well written. :-) --Hadz^Talk 17:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Object - Entirely in universe. Please see the perspective section of WP:WAF for information on how to write about fictional things. Wickethewok 17:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy object. Goodness, please consider a peer review. (There wasn't even a talk page, and I had to create it and add the fac tag.) Basics of WP:MOS are not even close. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Article is apparently copied verbatim from Wookiepedia. While I'm fairly certain they're GFDL, taking a completely in-universe article is not a good idea. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 18:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- In light of this aritcle's recent nomination for deletion, I would like to invoke WP:SNOW as well. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 00:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - ROFLMAO!!! in a BIG WAY and yes, you can take that as an Oppose/deleteBalloonman 23:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, see WP:CITET for proper referencing templates; they need not be used, but at least have some sort of a consistent format. Almost comical is the linking of other Wikipedia articles as primary references. -Phoenix 20:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe that's actually citing the works themselves rather than the aritcles. Still, it's not properly formatted. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 21:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ah, I understand what they are now. Thanks for clearing that up, and yes, they should be in a separate notes section or something similar. -Phoenix 08:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy oppose, is currently losing an AfD. --Golbez 14:12, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per all the above Aaron Bowen 11:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy oppose per Golbez; the AfD on it can be found here. — Pious7_Talk ^Contribs 20:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, especially seeing as the article has been deleted. Mangojuice^talk 03:22, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I've asked for it to be closed? --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 23:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]