Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Atomic theory/archive5
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted You may be looking for Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Atomic theory/Archive2, see Talk:Atomic theory/FAC archive sort
Atomic theory edit
This is the third (?) nomination of this article by me for the main page. Since the last nomination, I've redone the intro, added more references to the quantum physics section (as requested) and tweaked the images.Kurzon 19:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - Insufficient citations. Should have at least one per paragraph, and some don't. Fieari 04:40, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - per Fieari, the first three paragraphs in the first section don't have any citations. (Wikimachine 03:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC))[reply]
- Comments - this FAC is not listed on the article talk page, the Notes do not contain full, bibliographic information about the sources (for example, last access date and the journals some of the website info was originally published in), and the section headings don't conform to WP:MOS. Sandy (Talk) 15:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I've tried to correct the archive of the older FAC, and list the nom on the talk page, but this is the fourth time this article has been nominated here in less than 2 months, and I'm not sure I did the archive correctly. Sandy (Talk) 03:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.