Wikipedia:Ambassadors/Research/Article quality/Priority 2
Here are the explanations of each metric category! You will want to refer to this page as you are rating articles!
When reviewing an article, please keep the following in mind:
- The wiki markup should look like this:
==University, Course== === Article Name === ==== [link to article Pre] ==== ;Reviewer 1 Reviewer: {{User|user_id}} Scores: * Comprehensiveness: # * Sourcing: # * Neutrality: # * Readability: # * Formatting: # * Illustrations: # Total: '''#''' Comment: (optional) ==== [link to article Post] ==== ;Reviewer 1 Reviewer: {{User|user_id}} Scores: * Comprehensiveness: # * Sourcing: # * Neutrality: # * Readability: # * Formatting: # * Illustrations: # Total: '''#''' Comment: (optional)
- Only fill out: the user id section (user_id) and all score sections (#).
- Do not leave comments in the score sections
Shenandoah U, History and Systems of Psych edit
Narcissistic personality disorder edit
Post edit
- Reviewer 1
Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)
Scores:
- Comprehensiveness: 5
- Sourcing: 3
- Neutrality: 2
- Readability: 1
- Formatting: 1
- Illustrations: 1
Total: 13
–pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:44, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewer 2
Reviewer: Graeme Bartlett (talk)
Scores:
- Comprehensiveness: 6.2
- Sourcing: 4
- Neutrality: 2
- Readability: 2
- Formatting: 1.5
- Illustrations: 0.5
Total: 16.2
- Only a small addition was made here, but quality of formatting was lower than the exiting content. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:32, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewer 3
Reviewer: Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 21:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Scores:
- Comprehensiveness: 5
- Sourcing: 4
- Neutrality: 2
- Readability: 2
- Formatting: 1
- Illustrations: 1
Total: 15 Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 21:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
U Kentucky, Research in Personality edit
Bipolar disorder not otherwise specified edit
Pre edit
- Reviewer 1
Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)
Scores:
- Comprehensiveness: 2
- Sourcing: 4
- Neutrality: 2
- Readability: 1
- Formatting: 1
- Illustrations: 0
Total: 10
–pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:50, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewer 2
Reviewer: Mattsenate (talk) 01:14, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Scores:
- Comprehensiveness: 3
- Sourcing: 2
- Neutrality: 3
- Readability: 3
- Formatting: 2
- Illustrations: 0
Total: 13
- Reviewer 3
Reviewer: Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 21:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Scores:
- Comprehensiveness: 3
- Sourcing: 4
- Neutrality: 3
- Readability: 3
- Formatting: 2
- Illustrations: 0
Total: 15 Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 21:52, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Post edit
- Reviewer 1
Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)
Scores:
- Comprehensiveness: 4
- Sourcing: 3
- Neutrality: 2
- Readability: 1
- Formatting: 1
- Illustrations: 0
Total: 11
–pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:50, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewer 2
Reviewer: Mattsenate (talk) 02:00, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Scores:
- Comprehensiveness: 4
- Sourcing: 2
- Neutrality: 2
- Readability: 1
- Formatting: 1
- Illustrations: 0
Total: 10
- Reviewer 3
Reviewer: Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 22:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Scores:
- Comprehensiveness: 4
- Sourcing:3
- Neutrality: 2
- Readability: 1
- Formatting: 1
- Illustrations: 0
Total: 11 Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 22:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Comment: (I'd really like to give this .5; 1 feels too generous, but 0 is too harsh.) about formatting Lfcampos (talk) 23:13, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Histrionic personality disorder edit
Pre edit
- Reviewer 1
Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)
Scores:
- Comprehensiveness: 4
- Sourcing: 3
- Neutrality: 2
- Readability: 1
- Formatting: 1
- Illustrations: 0
Total: 11
–pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:50, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewer 2
Reviewer: Mattsenate (talk) 02:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Scores:
- Comprehensiveness: 5
- Sourcing: 2
- Neutrality: 2
- Readability: 2
- Formatting: 2
- Illustrations: 0
Total: 13
- Reviewer 3
Reviewer: AIRcorn (talk) 10:11, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Scores:
- Comprehensiveness: 4
- Sourcing: 2
- Neutrality: 2
- Readability: 2
- Formatting: 2
- Illustrations: 0
Total: 12
U Toronto Mississauga, Rhetoric of Digital… edit
Baylor Bears basketball team edit
Pre edit
- Reviewer 1
Reviewer: Pjoef (talk · contribs)
Scores:
- Comprehensiveness: 5
- Sourcing: 2
- Neutrality: 2
- Readability: 1
- Formatting: 2
- Illustrations: 1
Total: 13
–pjoef (talk • contribs) 11:58, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewer 2
Reviewer: Dcoetzee 01:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Scores:
- Comprehensiveness: 3
- Sourcing: 1
- Neutrality: 2
- Readability: 3
- Formatting: 2
- Illustrations: 1
Total: 12
- Reviewer 3
Reviewer: Graeme Bartlett (talk)
Scores:
- Comprehensiveness: 4
- Sourcing:1
- Neutrality:2
- Readability:2
- Formatting: 1
- Illustrations:0.5
Total:10.5