Wikipedia

Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/December 2006/Sbeyewitness

< Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance‎ | Requests

Case Filed On: 06:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedian filing request:

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

Wikipedia pages this pertains to:

Questions:

edit

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

  • Answer: Yes

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

  • Answer: Policy violation

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

  • Answer: I have edited this information. Please see contributions on the Elizabeth Loftus article page. Also, I have disengaged with these users for a while.


What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

  • Answer: I want to see the false and defamatory information permanently removed.

Summary:

edit

Currently, two users have continued to place false and defamatory information on the Elizabeth Loftus article regarding both the Scooter Libby testimony and Jane Doe case. Although these have been controversial cases, some information in the article is false, defamatory, and insulting. Despite my attempts to edit these paragraphs to reflect the truth, my attempts have been unsuccessful. I appreciate your help - thank you.

Discussion:

edit

Followup:

edit

When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

  • Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

  • Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

  • Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

  • Answer:


AMA Information

edit

Case Status: closed


Note: This case has been stale since it was registered; I won't waste any more time - I'm closing this case. Anthonycfc [T • C] 23:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advocate Status:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:AMA_Requests_for_Assistance/Requests/December_2006/Sbeyewitness&oldid=1137459349"