Wikipedia:"Breaching experiment" considered harmful

"Breaching experiment" is one of Wikipedia's favorite words, but it seems that a lot of Wikipedians either do not know what it means or labor under the delusion that euphemisms are an excuse to ignore the golden rule.

In real life, a breaching experiment is a kind of psychology experiment in which the experimenters violate social norms in order to study the reactions of the participants. They are not a form of disruption in order to prove a point. Typically, the only "point" the researchers are trying to prove is some dispassionate statement about how humans behave, and not a claim that the norm is intrinsically good or bad.

When you accuse someone of conducting a breaching experiment, you're saying they're doing whatever they're doing to provoke reactions, and not to accomplish any project-relevant goal, not even a purely political goal. This is more succinctly known as "trolling." Trolling is a fairly serious accusation to throw around, and even if you're right, it's probably a bad idea anyway.

On the other hand, "breaching experiment" is also commonly used on Wikipedia to describe (and usually disparage) any violation of community norms, regardless of purpose. Aside from being wholly inaccurate, this is a form of jargon, which makes the project less friendly to newbies. The issue is particularly pronounced since newbies are most likely to violate community norms in the first place.

Instead of calling something a breaching experiment, it may be more prudent to discuss the relevant norms. If they truly are accepted norms, it should be pretty easy to find a policy or guideline to back your position up, or at least an essay. If not, you should probably reassess your position, and perhaps adopt a more conciliatory tone.