User talk:Zagalejo/Archive 11

Dennis Johnson edit

I was thinking more a suburb in the colloquial sense, you know picket fences, perfect lawns, safety and all that. Technically you're more correct that I on the subject of Compton. Just wanted to make it clear I wasn't attempting vandalism. Plus, I made that edit in another location, so that explains why the IP address I'm signing here isn't the same as the one I made the edit from. 50.138.199.209 (talk) 05:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Steve Bartman, Continued 2 edit

Thanks for the revisions man, it looks perfect. Hopefully Steve can be vindicated someday and this sort of thing not happen again in MLB! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnnyangelNIU (talkcontribs) 13:12, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Steve Bartman, Continued edit

Thanks for the info man, looks nearly perfect! If I may suggest (not to nit-pick), perhaps put "Mike Everitt" instead of "the umpire" (unless you meant 'umpire's' collectively). I know it maybe slightly superficial, but in my original edit, I preferred to add the word non-malicious, to give some creedence to Steve. His interference was non-malicios in nature, whereas other fan interference throughout history was malicious and intentional.

Secondly, just to discuss back and forth. Why wasn't instant-replay used during this critical play? Or was it? I think a few minutes of all the umpires analizing the footage could have made a huge difference. As we both stated, play could have continued, Castillo probably called out, and Bartman and a few other fans could have been quietly removed (again it was non-malicious, but just to follow the MLB rules). It seems in hindsight the umpire or umpires helped contribute to what would become the domino effect? Your thoughts?  :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnnyangelNIU (talkcontribs) 13:48, 20 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Steve Bartman edit

Zagalego - first off, I BARELY know how to correspond on Wikipedia so I hope this finds you well. Please also forgive me if I do not write something here or sign it correctly, I am still learning! Usually I feel my edits are near fact or factual, and rarely do I do it. This being said, I feel my edit is important - here's why. According to that 2011 film Catching Hell, it was insinuated and all but scientifically proven that Steve's arms DID slightly cross over (for a brief second or so) the railing. Although his 'interference' is non-malicious, it can clearly be seen to the naked eye if you study all the camera angles. I feel this is important, because the information as it stands now simply leaves the casual reader with the fact that one umpire did not judge it to be fan interference,and that can be misconstrued as hard fact. As we all know, umpires can be wrong, and many believe he was wrong in this scenario. I kinda gave both sides of the argument, and that technically in the best most correct call, Castillo would have been called 'out' per major league rule if it had been deemed interference (again non-malicious in nature, but still), and we may not know how the true outcome of the game would have played out. Hit me back, perhaps we can come up with a compromise both fair to the best evidence and facts and also still partial to Steve's defense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnnyangelNIU (talkcontribs) 14:09, 19 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Drollinger Article edit

Zagalejo, check out ralphdrollinger.com. It appears he has updated his picture authorization to include public domain usage, which means you can now paste it onto his Wiki article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AccuracyInPosting (talkcontribs) 02:46, 19 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

You are right, he was a free agent after not having signed from being drafted the previous three years and not signed. Maverick sources indicate Norm Sonju, the then GM of the Mavericks signed him before he signed Dick Motta as the head coach. Drollinger was actually instrumental, used by Sonju, to lure Don Carter in as the capitalizing owner. Not sure where this is published, but it is very accurate. Hope this helps.---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by AccuracyInPosting (talkcontribs) 04:25, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Zagalejo: If you look at Drollinger's SE on Google you will notice (I think on page two) a Wiki reference to his picture. Perhaps you can find a locater number or something and move it into his main article on Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.176.47.25 (talk) 00:54, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

If we're looking at the same thing, that picture appears to come from MavsWiki.com, which is not directly related to Wikipedia. (It simply uses the same software.) Zagalejo^^^ 00:58, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Barbosa edit

I found it here: http://www.spotrac.com/nba/boston-celtics/leandro-barbosa/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vebenau (talkcontribs) 21:53, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

No, 1,229,255 is the base salary of the team. 854,389 is the minimum salary of veterans in the league, with is what he gets.

Categories edit

Any ethnicity-related category should be supported by a cited statement in the article. Thanks. Zagalejo^^^ 20:56, 21 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Look at this. Bosniak population %73 in Sjenica. Undo your change please -- Esc2003 (talk) 16:37, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
But that means 27% aren't. And those numbers are from 2002 - over 20 years after Hedo himself was born. We can't be adding content based on assumptions and guesswork. We need a source that flat out says that Turkoglu is of Bosniak descent. This is basic Wikipedia policy (WP:V, WP:NOR, etc). Zagalejo^^^ 23:34, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
We have source (Boşnak savaşı, Bosna da gurur duydu). OK now? -- Esc2003 (talk) 18:12, 23 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail! edit

 
Hello, Zagalejo. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 04:16, 23 October 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Keilana|Parlez ici 04:16, 23 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Birthplace of Andris Biedriņš edit

Hi Zagalejo, thanks for your efforts to undo my recent corrections regarding the birthplace of Latvian basketball player Andris Biedriņš. Please take note that Baltic states were occupied by USSR in 1940 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_the_Baltic_states) and so called "Latvian SSR" was illegitimate entity under international law and not recognized by most Western countries, including USA. Btw, you will not find any Wikipedia articles about Estonians born in so called "Estonian SSR". As Latvian living in Latvia, I urge you to restore my editions, i.e. Andris Biedriņš was born in Latvia. Thanks. Harijs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.109.195.106 (talk) 17:24, 23 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Mavericks edit

Yeah, true. I'm not 100% sure. Be sure to revert my edits if you feel they aren't official. I just saw this and thought it was good enough. DaHuzyBru (talk) 03:26, 27 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Btw, I did look for a official Mavericks release of this and couldn't find one either. I just thought that be good enough. And yes, sorry, I didn't look at the Mavs-Bobcats game today. DaHuzyBru (talk) 03:32, 27 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Miami Heat page protection edit

Could you perhaps semi-protect the Miami Heat page as there is constant vandalism from IP address users. DaHuzyBru (talk) 05:11, 27 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ok, sure. Thanks. DaHuzyBru (talk) 05:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)Reply


NBA Player page vandalism edit

I think the user 24.22.10.19 needs to be blocked, he's been vandalizing several NBA player pages — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hellas12345 (talkcontribs) 00:51, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Fred Lewis edit

Hey, just letting you know I indeed pulled the date from the California Death Index coinciding with the sourced death date. Sorry, I'm a bit lazy with cites... – Connormah (talk) 03:28, 31 October 2012 (UTC)Reply


Festus Ezeli edit

Let's wait until the end of the season to start a stats table. The stats are unlikely to be updated on a regular basis throughout the season. There aren't enough people to do the work. Zagalejo^^^ 16:56, 1 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • If you start when the person first starts then it will be done you can leave the stats so that it can at least be updated if it is removed it will be forgotten and never done. Who knows I may want to update it a time or two a month. MDSanker 09:56, 2 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
    • Well I will not get into a editing war with you. I was going to do it myself however since you seem to know it all I will let you have this one. BTW you don't know me, so don assume you know what I will or want do. Have a great week end. MDSanker 21:32, 2 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Eddy Curry edit

Where is there any official report that Curry was waived by the Mavs? There is nothing on the Mavericks site or NBA.com. I did read it somewhere but when I used unofficially report's from Mavs ESPN when Douglas-Roberts and Ely were signed, you didn't like it. I'm sure it's right and it is listed on ESPN NBA Rumors, but still. DaHuzyBru (talk) 03:50, 3 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

There is also nothing official about Troy Murphy. The reference for the Troy Murphy signing is from the same site that I got the Douglas-Roberts/Ely signing and you said that wasn't official?? [1] [2] DaHuzyBru (talk) 03:55, 3 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I agree that the Mavs site is bad with transactions, and you make some good points. Thanks. DaHuzyBru (talk) 04:54, 3 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Joey Dorsey edit

No. They have not yet officially released him. They have to either pay a buyout, take him to court saying he violated his contract's moral clause, or they have to suspend him and keep his letter of clearance. So far it has not been reported what they will do, just that he won't play with the team again. However, no, his contract has not yet been cancelled as far as I know. But there should be a media report from the club fairly soon on what they will do probably.Bluesangrel (talk) 12:41, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

They officially released him - [3]Bluesangrel (talk) 21:47, 7 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Edit warning edit

Does User:Fredex50's insistence on painting Austin Rivers' role in Duke's loss to Lehigh constitute edit warring (he has made the same change 4 times now)? I left a message on his page asking him to stop with the biased writing, but who knows what will happen. Some folks just see WP as a playground for their teams' rivalries. Rikster2 (talk) 18:34, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

I hear you, and see that you and R both have finally left the topic added(both AR and LT) in a NPOV. Personally, with the prior complete deletion(s), it appeared that it was also you (and Z) who also 'had the agenda' Fredex50 (talk) 19:09, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply


Dr Karl vandalism lock edit

Thanks for locking that page, there is a serial pest that is trying everything he can to get the Dr Karl Self Service Science Forum (http://chrw.customer.netspace.net.au/hf/sts-vBull.html) shut down and the Wiki page on Dr Karl is one of his avenues of spamming. He did, unfortunately, get the SSSF page on Wiki shut down but spamming the moderators here. He suckered you lot into removing it and that's a shame. Billzilla (talk) 20:46, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Lin and GQ edit

Nice catch re: Woods. He is rarely referred to as Asian American, but I'm not even going to touch that one.—Bagumba (talk) 02:49, 10 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Use of "reportedly" edit

I understand the benefits of being conservative and using "reportedly". For things such as trades and signings that aren't official, it should always IMO be used because the truth will be known soon enough. However, in the case of Jackson being courted by the Lakers, "reportedly" seems overkill based on the widespread sources that reported it. Also, as we may never know the real story, "unnamed sources" might be as good as we ever get here. Interested on your perspective on the wording.—Bagumba (talk) 06:15, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

In this situation, I just don't feel comfortable stating anything as an absolute fact. As far as I know, the Lakers' decision makers never made any public statements that they wanted Jackson from the start. (Of course, if I'm wrong about that, then that would change everything.) Zagalejo^^^ 06:22, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
They are all unnamed sources so far from the Lakers. I just feel "reportedly" is overkill if multiple reliable sources support it, even if they get it from from unnamed sources. I guess we could also say he was the media's favorite to get the job. Anyways, just bouncing off ideas.—Bagumba (talk) 06:31, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Maybe things will be clearer after a few days. At this stage, when people are still issuing statements on the matter, I think it's better to word things conservatively. You might want to ask for comments at the NBA project page. Zagalejo^^^ 06:48, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
That's OK. The question was as much if not more to understand your thought process than a dire need to remove "reportedly".—Bagumba (talk) 06:59, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank You edit

I just wanted to say thanks for your support, and congratulations on becoming an admin! --Musdan77 (talk) 19:03, 27 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Richard Nixon talk page notice edit

I have added a section on the talk page for the article Richard Nixon titled "Section deleted on 13 December 2012." Please share your thoughts on the talk page. Thanks. Mitchumch (talk) 17:14, 16 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I love this team and I know all about her — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.66.61.6 (talk) 20:57, 16 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

South Side edit

I saw your comments. At this point, I have just about given up on the FAC. This seems to be a pretty rare bird though because it is a FAC delist that I think still can pass GA. Most FAC delists these days are articles that are substandard GAs. I am probably going to pursue a GAC after the delist.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:52, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

James Anderson edit

Yeah sorry. I was making an assumption. I just assumed he'd return to the Vipers as most players do after they are waived from NBA teams if they are called up. We'll wait for something to official say. That was my bad, sorry man. DaHuzyBru (talk) 06:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I see that now. Took their time. Haha. Cheers. DaHuzyBru (talk) 03:15, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Merry Christmas edit

I hope your early months as an admin have gone well. I regret that we have not been able to interact more, given that we apparently have some of the same interests. AutomaticStrikeout (TC) 22:55, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ben Wallace edit

One of six players with more blocks than personal fouls. -- source is basketball-reference.com http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=combined&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=0&age_max=99&height_min=0&height_max=99&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&is_active=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=0&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=&c1stat=&c1comp=gt&c1val=&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=blk_per_g&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=pf_per_g&order_by=g

Only one of these with more steals than turnovers. -- same source There are only 5 other guys on the list and their steals and turnovers are shown above.

Note: the round-off function on basketball-reference shows Keith Closs on this list looking at his numbers eliminates him.

It's an admittedly unusual accomplishment but it also reflects the unusual nature of Ben Wallace's game, IMO.

You're right about there only being five. My post had included "min 150 games" so that all of the players who barely played would be excluded). Since we seem to be in agreement, I'll restore the previous entry with the correction from 6 to 5. -- Matt — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.86.6.30 (talk) 08:10, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Kent Bazemore edit

There is nothing about Jeremy Tyler or Kent Bazemore being re-called on either of these sites: [4] [5]. Just letting you know, although I'm sure you've seen anyway. DaHuzyBru (talk) 06:10, 26 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

True, its on ESPN's transactions as well. Didn't look there. Cheers. DaHuzyBru (talk) 06:17, 26 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

User that keeps changing referenced heights and weights of players edit

There is a user just with an IP address (that varies a bit from time to time, but it is obviously the same user) that has been changing referenced heights and weights of players for a long time here. They always change the height or weight and give no explanation why, and don't leave a source. They even keep the current sources, which give different heights. They have been doing this for quite a long time, and I have just been reverting the edits back. But after this continues, I think we need to have a discussion with this editor. The latest edits like this were from User:94.64.144.182 [6] (edit history) - but this same IP range, with slightly different exact addresses has been doing these same edits for a long time. You can go back and look at some of the histories of the player pages that the latest IP address edited, and see the previous same edit pattern over a quite awhile. So I think we need to have a discussion on this. Your input on how to discuss this is welcomed. Thanks.Bluesangrel (talk) 20:19, 26 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Spanish League lists players almost always by barefoot height. But most other leagues list it by shoe height. So are we going to change it every single time a player moved into or out of the Spanish League? I notice for example that NBA players like Fernandez don't get their height changed back to the barefoot listing the Spanish League uses.Bluesangrel (talk) 10:42, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
A lot of European players are listed by barefoot height. But the NBA is almost always shoe height. I don't think we should switch the heights back and forth. I think we should pick one or the other. Going by the height listed by the club to change it whenever a player switches teams does not make sense. You use Panko, he was listed at 2.06 by Panathinaikos, just look at his profile at their website. Literally 2 days later he is listed at 2.04 by Malaga's website. It does not make sense to be changing things like that from 2 days to the next. Panko is listed at 6-9 by the NBA [7], so I think that's appropriate. I guess it does not matter, but I don't really agree to change the heights every time a player switches teams, especially since some teams from some leagues use barefoot height, while most others use shoe height.Bluesangrel (talk) 15:16, 31 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Mario Kasun edit

Friend, let me tell you.. Stay up to the NBA-related articles where you can get all the stats on one page, without calculating percentages and all the other stuff. In this (Mario's) case, all the information you can get at the Euroleague.net player's profile, so fix it if you doesn't agree with me somewhere. And just in case of his FT%, he has 112/160 in his career (0.700%), and in this season (2012-13) he has 10/18 (0.556%). Next time, check your results once again, before asking some stupid questions. AirWolf (talk) 17:34, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Enes Kanter edit

Why don't we list his weight as 267 per nba.com? [8] Just wondering. And what is the deal with "game notes", why is this the source? DaHuzyBru (talk) 07:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ok, yeah, sure. I understand now. I would prefere to use whatever NBA.com says, but in cases like this, well then it's hard to win. DaHuzyBru (talk) 01:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 3 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Randy Holcomb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Euroleague scoring record edit

Shouldn't we clarify that the current Euroleague only has ownership and the rights to stats since the year 2000? Meaning that all stats from the previous league owner (from 1958 to 1999) are not allowed to be counted in their current records? I mean, since Brown scored 41 points, but it's only the record since 2000. With the actual record being 99 from 1965 - [9] - so shouldn't we clarify this in the article?173.216.233.111 (talk) 00:29, 5 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Daequan Cook edit

Thx for the message. You're right...I was just trolling, I guess. Cheers! 98.206.46.208 (talk) 20:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

An invitation for you! edit

 
Hello, Zagalejo. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's article for improvement. If you're interested in participating, please add your name to the list of members. Happy editing! AutomaticStrikeout (TC) 03:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 21 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rick Fox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page College Humor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Question About Source edit

So, if I used words from quote...would I have to use the double quotation mark at the end of the sentence? Or the reference tag? (TheBusinessMajor48 (talk) 01:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC))Reply

Ahh...yes that'll do. I'll re-word it. Thanks. (TheBusinessMajor48 (talk) 02:09, 23 January 2013 (UTC))Reply

Eric Zorn edit

I am very impressed with the major cleanup you did with Eric Zorn. You did a fantastic job. You turned a blatant fan page with no reliable sources into a very credible encyclopedia stub, which I understand you plan to expand. You got rid of all the junk and replaced it with worthy content. I had no idea where to even begin with it because it was such a huge mess. Haha. Although I originally questioned his notability after reviewing WP:CREATIVE, the fact that he also wrote the book about Laurie Dann, which was turned into a movie, convinced me that he is. I remember reading a long talk page discussion involving many experienced editors where it was explained that simply writing for a major newspaper doesn't necessarily qualify someone as notable. They also gave many examples of articles of newspaper reporters/columnists, etc. that were deleted due to non-notability. The points I remember most were to the effect of... if every major newspaper writer were notable, then they'd all have Wikipedia articles, but the key is that the person needs to be a "significant contributor" to the paper. Anyway, I just wanted to say thanks for the fine work you did on that article. Because of your efforts, you've convinced me that you are a high quality, hard-working editor; therefore, please do whatever you think is best with the Dennis Rodman marriage and divorce dates. I have one favor; can you please put Eric Zorn on your watchlist to make sure no more bad content is added to it? ;) --76.189.109.147 (talk) 08:53, 26 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'd like to make contact asap with "Zagalejo" as I'm interesting in the nuts and bolts of the editing process of these pages and the removal several months ago of most of the content from "my" page gives me an entree. Who are the anonymous folks who decide what is and isn't worthy of inclusion in this limitless storehouse of information; who decide that a page is a "blatant fan page"? Not only do the standards seems squishy, the levels of review are not only anonymous but impenetrable and -- who the heck knows? -- arbitrary and even ill motivated. I'm at ericzorn@gmail.com so YOU know how to reach ME. Ejzorn (talk) 20:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your opinion is requested edit

Could you chime in here? AutomaticStrikeout (TC) 20:59, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Jonas Valanciunas edit

(Duhon) has been reverting Valanciunas' height and weight to the NBA.com listings, while he has been denying this http://blog.raptors.com/press-releases/raptors-announce-training-camp-roster/, even though he admitted that the raptors.com site and nba.com were one and the same. I suspect that he has an alternate account by the name of (Brodey) which he used to change Enes Kanter's height and weight, in the wake of my rebuttal of "Look at Enes Kanters NBA listing and Wikipedia page" to his argument of "all NBA players on Wikipedia have their heights and weights listed according to NBA.com". Both (Duhon) and (Brodey) coincidentally have an intense interest in Hollywood North and a .jpg of LeBron James that may or may not have copyright infringements. I have already appealed to my old acquaintance (DaHuzyBru). I will attempt to convince Duhon with http://www.nba.com/gamenotes/raptors.pdf; page 11 clearly lists him as 7'0" 257lbs RoTi37 (talk) 05:58, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Looks like I'm not having success with the official NBA game note listings. RoTi37 (talk) 06:16, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Also, could you run a CheckUser on Duhon and Brodey?RoTi37 (talk) 06:18, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'd advise you to not read through the Valanciunas Talk page in its entirety, there is some pretty foul stuff in there. RoTi37 (talk) 06:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I think we should look into the possibility of Duhon being a sock. I have already posted my preliminary findings here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bbb23#SPI. Tell me what you think.RoTi37 (talk) 06:25, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Brodey's probably not gonna show up now if Duhon has any brains at all, after how much suspicion we have expressed.RoTi37 (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nordic alien image edit

I only have two personal site references that claim the image is in the public domain. The original owner has taken down his website but it was indeed released into the public domain. Is the image still unusuable in this case? --Neoconfederate (talk) 01:39, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Machado Rio Valley edit

I would prefer we get a specific consensus on how to handle this issue. I would favor removing the arrow before a consecutive double entry of the same D-League team. The club history is not going to be able to convey the complexity of his contract status and at the end of the day the Rockets may even re-sign him if he performs well. What would we do then, have 4 entries for 2 clubs for a single season? Rikster2 (talk) 19:48, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Zagalejo. You have new messages at AutomaticStrikeout's talk page.
Message added 02:30, 5 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

AutomaticStrikeout (TC) 02:30, 5 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Can you block someone? edit

Hi Zag. I asked a different administrator to block User:Klbog1987 because he had previously blocked Klbog for incompetence/disruptive editing/adding false and or unverifiable information into article repeatedly (see here for discussion). Every time Klbog gets left a message on his talk page raising those concerns, he blanks it. Not only does Klbog1987 not respond to anyone (WP:HEAR), he hasn't changed his disruptive behavior (WP:COMPETENCE). He was discussed at an ANI. Could you block him permanently please? Jrcla2 (talk) 18:23, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

After Klbog1987's blanking of Zagalejo's talk page, I looked into their edit history and blocked for 72h. Lack of discussions aside, continuing to add unsourced and disputed content—even to different articles—is a blockable offense. Failing to respond to discussions should be interpretted as an implicit agreement of the charges.—Bagumba (talk) 20:53, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Also, while I did not block indef as Jrcla2 suggested, it would be IMO reasonable for a repeat offense esp. if their is no talk page activity.—Bagumba (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

RfA: thank you for your support edit

Zag, I wanted to thank you for your kind words and support during my RfA. Assuming that I survive the final 24 hours of the rack, I hope you won't mind if I stop by your talk page from time to time with how-to or what-do-you-think questions. Best regards, Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 00:34, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Well, that did not turn out as I had hoped, but, after the dust settles, hopefully there is something positive to be learned from it. Thanks again for sticking up for me and my record when the chips were down. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 01:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Danilovic edit

Alright, we'll stay away from terminology that can be construed as value-judgement, although when you've got a documented rap sheet as long as Danilovic's, "surly" is almost a compliment.

Also, Blic is a reliable source. It's one of the high-circulation dailies in Serbia. Yes, it's a middle-market tabloid, but it doesn't invent stories. It oscillates between indepth serious stuff and frivolous celebrity entertainment schlock. It's very similar to Britain's Daily Mail. Plus the case of Danilovic beating up referee Juras is well-documented in Serbian media as well as the resulting sanctions, both basketball-related and civic.Zvonko (talk) 01:33, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Can you give your input on this discussion? edit

Hey, I think you could help give some good input on this basketball discussion here [10] - you know a lot about the European leagues like Adriatic League, Eurocup, etc.Bluesangrel (talk) 22:47, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Latest trade edit

Is this reference enough to justify the latest Kings, Rockets ad Suns trade: [11] I need your help right now, I'm not going to win this fight against it not being official yet. DaHuzyBru (talk) 02:30, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Neither, I've been strong on this one. Cheers. DaHuzyBru (talk) 02:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, the Rockets also have nothing about Morris in their press release either: [12] DaHuzyBru (talk) 06:29, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dwayne Jones edit

Could you maybe consider removing the semi-protection tag on Dwayne Jones. It seems that it was put there indefinitely and never taken off after some transaction finally went official - in 2010. Just bringing it to your attention. DaHuzyBru (talk) 08:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 22 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shavlik Randolph, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cangrejeros de Santurce (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Restoring an article edit

Hi Zag. Can you read what I wrote at User:Explicit's talk page: see the thread User talk:Explicit#Steve Rogers (basketball). I just noticed that s/he hasn't edited in 5 days so I'm not sure how long it will be until my concern is addressed. You're a basketball guy and an admin to boot. Can you please restore Steve Rogers (basketball)? Jrcla2 (talk) 17:00, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Restored, and replied at Explicit's page. Zagalejo^^^ 19:59, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Juwan Howard/archive5 is open. You have participated in review 4 and have a mutual interest in WP:CHICAGO, WP:NBA and WP:CBBALL topics. I hope you participate.— Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyTheTiger (talkcontribs) 15:25, 23 February 2013‎ (UTC)Reply

It has been quite a while since you have commented on this one. Several people have made up their mind. Have you thought about making a decision on this article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:53, 10 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
What issues are you still concerned about. Can you either strike or summarize unresolved issues.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:12, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
I tried to break up a paragraph that you said did not flow and addressed another issue.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:37, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
I don't know how you feel about the copyediting of the last week, but I'm calling your attention to it.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:00, 25 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Paul George edit

I don't know about you, but I vote for a semi-protection on Paul George's page. I'm sure your sick of reverting the constant changing of his height. Why haven't you already? DaHuzyBru (talk) 05:52, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, nah fair enough. DaHuzyBru (talk) 00:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

LeBron edit conflict? edit

With your edit, did you intend to swap out the source. I added it to make it clear they didnt sign until later.—Bagumba (talk) 02:46, 28 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I must have had the editing window open for a while. I reverted my edit, and went back and fixed the stats table. Zagalejo^^^ 02:48, 28 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Tyreke Evans edit edit

Quote: However, Evans was not traded.

Thank you for that, I knew I had forgotten something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matselmi (talkcontribs) 18:52, 28 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Kyrie Irving edit

Thank you for semi-protecting Kyrie Irving, I was just about to suggest it at WP:RPP, but that takes a while as you probably know. And your edit summary was correct, it was straining my time. –TCN7JM 02:59, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Museums in Chicago edit

I created a template a long time ago just for museums that I forgot to deploy. Then someone else created one that is for Museums and cultural institutions. I'm not sure what this combination is suppose to encompass. Should in include theaters (which also have their own template)? I think about 75% of mine are on his. His has a lot of redlinks.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

His is fancier, but mine is more like other cities and has no redlinks.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:51, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Bring this over to WT:CHICAGO.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:59, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

RFC-withdrawal closure edit

Could you close my RFC at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation#2nd order disambiguation by birth date - RFC. I seem to have defined the wrong scope of the issue and posted it at the wrong page, according to the feedback I am getting. I would like to withdraw my RFC nomination.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:08, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your assistance. The new discussion is at Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(people)#RFC-birth_date_format_conformity_when_used_to_disambiguate. How should I incorporate that at the talk page of the old discussion.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:51, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
That seems right.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:43, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Article Feedback deployment edit

Hey Zagalejo; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:19, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Xavier Silas edit

Well, I edit all of the D-League rosters every so often. So when I came to the Red Claws, he wasn't on their official roster. The Red Claws have two rosters: [13] [14]. I go by the first one, but yeah I'm not sure other than that. Maybe he is still with the team but inactive because of injury ??? DaHuzyBru (talk) 02:22, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

The first one seems more official to me. DaHuzyBru (talk) 02:23, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I'm going with that he is indefinitely inactive and that he has a season ending injury. DaHuzyBru (talk) 03:46, 16 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

A cheeseburger for you! edit

  For your work on various magic-related articles. Bddmagic (talk) 03:42, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- --JamboQueen (talk) 17:28, 18 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

MOS discussion regarding linked NBA seasons in basketball player infoboxes edit

FYI, Zagalejo -- Please be aware of this discussion at MOS: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Years; reverts. This discussion grew out of a feature article review for an NBA basketball player Juwan Howard. Before jumping into the discussion, I suggest that you read the relevant MOS section, MOS:YEAR. As I'm sure you can see, this has the potential to significantly change the currently used year span conventions in the NBA, NFL, MLB, NHL and soccer player infoboxes. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 05:26, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Magic Johnson edit

Thanks for the clarity about Magic's son. It smacked of gossip to me, but chose to expand it and write it a little better instead of removing it. I thought it might fit into how his relationship is with his children, but I believe your decision is a better choice.[[D-free]] (talk) 03:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

saw your post. edit

.. and will watchlist Kenny Anderson (basketball) for a bit. I didn't look to see if you tried this first - but WP:RFPP is a good place to post for protection when you are actually editing the article too. Protection looks valid though, and I appreciate your concerns of wp:involved. If I see anything out of line, I'll drop you a note either here or on the talk page. — Ched :  ?  01:19, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 4 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rubén Garcés, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mets de Guaynabo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Launched a BLPN re Quin Snyder edit

Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Quin_Snyder_photo. Arbor to SJ (talk) 05:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join WikiProject Admin Nominators edit

  Hello. You are invited to join WikiProject Admin Nominators, a project which aims to support editors interested in nominating at Requests for Adminship. We hope that you will join and help to shape the new project. AutomaticStrikeout (TCSign AAPT) 00:36, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Funderburke edit

He signed a letter of intent to play at Indiana, and Indiana held onto it, thus keeping him on the hook for the obligations within it. The tactic was used, of course, to prevent him from playing at a rival school. While most schools would release a player to attend a school out of conference, Indiana did not in this instance.--YHoshua (talk) 12:02, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
thanks, its a pleasure! Helibebcnofne (talk) 02:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Kenny Anderson edit

I declined the RPP, as it was only a single IP. Better to take action if edit warring persists on the single user. I've added to my watchlist.—Bagumba (talk) 00:08, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Chicago help edit

I am looking for another Chicagoan to assume some responsibility in WP:CHICAGO. Would you be willing to lead or co-lead the 2013 Chicago WP:WIKNIC. Could you please ping me if you are interested.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:20, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

IP vandalizing CFB coach navboxes edit

Hey, Zags. Can you have a talk with this IP user: User talk:70.198.133.191? He's been deleting the interim coaches from three CFB coach navboxes. He's been repeatedly reverted by several editors, and I just left a message on his talk page. He doesn't seem to be getting it, though. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 02:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Page move edit

Hi Zag. Can you please move Utah Flash over the currently-redirect Delaware 87ers? Thanks! Jrcla2 (talk) 13:45, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

FA Thanks edit

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial contributions to Juwan Howard, which has recently become a WP:FA.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:02, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Re: Utah Flash & Delaware 87ers edit

The current convention is that we keep the old team's page active, as you'll see the Colorado 14ers' page separate from the Texas Legends, the Anaheim Arsenal from the Springfield Armor, the Dakota Wizards from the Santa Cruz Warriors and the New Mexico Thunderbirds from the Canton Charge. Could you please restore the Utah Flash's page history and its content before you redirected it? Thank you, Tom Danson (talk) 05:41, 11 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Scottie Pippen edit

This page seems to be getting hit with a lot of vandalism. Do you think we should request page protection?Hoops gza (talk) 03:20, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nhlfan1456 edit

I'm not sure why this account isn't banned already, but could you have a look. I feel he should be. [15] DaHuzyBru (talk) 01:56, 17 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cheers. DaHuzyBru (talk) 02:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

May 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Roy Hibbert may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:36, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

List of Career Achievments by Dwayne Wade edit

Hi Zagalejo,

Apparently, I created an article that had a misspelling. It was called "List of Career Achievments by Dwayne Wade". A Mod changed the misspelling and now there are two articles about the same subject matter, one being List of Career Achievments by Dwayne Wade and the other List of Career Achievments by Dwyane Wade. Can you delete the one that is misspelled?

Thank you, Robert4565 Robert (talk) 04:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC) Robert (talk) 04:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC) Robert (talk) 04:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC) Robert (talk) 04:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply